UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One) 

[X]           QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
 
 
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

 or 
 
 [  ]           TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

   
   
For the transition period from
                                                           to

   
Commission File Number:
1-13274

     
     
 
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
  
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Maryland
  
22-3305147
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
     
     
     
343 Thornall Street, Edison, New Jersey
  
08837-2206
(Address of principal executive offices)
  
(Zip Code)
     
     
     
     
 
(732) 590-1000
  
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.                                 YES  X NO _
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  X  NO _
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 
 
Large accelerated filer  x                                                                                                           Accelerated filer  ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                           Smaller reporting company  ¨
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES _ NO X
 
As of October 26, 2015, there were 89,310,574 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
 
 


 
 
 











       
   
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION
  
       
   
FORM 10-Q
  
       
   
INDEX
  
       
Part I
Financial Information
Page
       
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited):
3
       
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015
4
   
     and December 31, 2014
  
       
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months 
5
   
     ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
  
       
   
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the nine months 
6
   
     ended September 30, 2015
  
       
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months 
7
   
     ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
  
       
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
       
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 
37
   
     and Results of Operations
  
       
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
57
       
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
58
       
Part II
Other Information
  
       
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
59
       
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
59
       
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
59
       
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
59
       
 
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
59
       
 
Item 5.
Other Information
59
       
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
59
       
Signatures
    
60
       
Exhibit Index
    
61
       


 
2
 



MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION 
 
Part I – Financial Information



Item 1.        Financial Statements
 
The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, of changes in equity, and of cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods. 
 
The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in Mack-Cali Realty Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
 
The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.


 
3
 


MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)
           
           
   
September 30,
    
December 31,
ASSETS
  
2015
    
2014
Rental property
          
Land and leasehold interests
$
 706,122
  
$
 760,855
Buildings and improvements
  
 3,619,200
    
 3,753,300
Tenant improvements
  
 398,812
    
 431,969
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
  
 13,582
    
 12,055
   
 4,737,716
    
 4,958,179
Less – accumulated depreciation and amortization
  
 (1,434,603)
    
 (1,414,305)
           
Net investment in rental property
  
 3,303,113
    
 3,543,874
Cash and cash equivalents
  
 30,866
    
 29,549
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
  
 299,486
    
 247,468
Unbilled rents receivable, net
  
 118,466
    
 123,885
Deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net
  
 200,723
    
 204,650
Restricted cash
  
 40,068
    
 34,245
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
          
of $1,579 and $2,584
  
 9,180
    
 8,576
           
Total assets
$
 4,001,902
  
$
 4,192,247
           
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
          
Senior unsecured notes
$
 1,268,568
  
$
 1,267,744
Revolving credit facility
  
 35,000
    
 -
Mortgages, loans payable and other obligations
  
 740,024
    
 820,910
Dividends and distributions payable
  
 15,582
    
 15,528
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
  
 136,673
    
 126,971
Rents received in advance and security deposits
  
 47,645
    
 52,146
Accrued interest payable
  
 27,413
    
 26,937
Total liabilities
  
 2,270,905
    
 2,310,236
Commitments and contingencies
          
           
Equity:
          
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity:
          
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 190,000,000 shares authorized,
          
89,310,243 and 89,076,578 shares outstanding
  
 893
    
 891
Additional paid-in capital
  
 2,565,143
    
 2,560,183
Dividends in excess of net earnings
  
 (1,070,456)
    
 (936,293)
Total Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity
  
 1,495,580
    
 1,624,781
           
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries:
          
Operating Partnership
  
 180,691
    
 202,173
Consolidated joint ventures
  
 54,726
    
 55,057
Total noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
  
 235,417
    
 257,230
           
Total equity
  
 1,730,997
    
 1,882,011
           
Total liabilities and equity
$
 4,001,902
  
$
 4,192,247

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
4
 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)
                         
                         
     
           Three Months Ended
    
           Nine Months Ended
     
            September 30,
    
            September 30,
REVENUES
    
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Base rents
  
$
 119,707 
  
$
 125,793 
  
$
 364,746 
  
$
 393,054 
Escalations and recoveries from tenants
    
 15,050 
    
 19,172 
    
 49,291 
    
 61,736 
Real estate services
    
 7,510 
    
 7,622 
    
 22,555 
    
 21,323 
Parking income
    
 2,749 
    
 2,255 
    
 8,141 
    
 6,605 
Other income
    
 1,142 
    
 647 
    
 3,707 
    
 2,667 
Total revenues
    
 146,158 
    
 155,489 
    
 448,440 
    
 485,385 
                         
EXPENSES
                        
Real estate taxes
    
 19,143 
    
 22,154 
    
 63,005 
    
 69,880 
Utilities
    
 13,172 
    
 15,701 
    
 44,146 
    
 58,555 
Operating services
    
 24,535 
    
 26,519 
    
 78,607 
    
 83,581 
Real estate services expenses
    
 6,673 
    
 6,933 
    
 19,520 
    
 20,213 
General and administrative
    
 13,670 
    
 12,665 
    
 36,669 
    
 49,219 
Depreciation and amortization
    
 44,099 
    
 41,983 
    
 127,266 
    
 131,679 
Impairments
    
 164,176 
    
 -
    
 164,176 
    
 -
Total expenses
    
 285,468 
    
 125,955 
    
 533,389 
    
 413,127 
Operating income (loss)
    
 (139,310)
    
 29,534 
    
 (84,949)
    
 72,258 
                         
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
                        
Interest expense
    
 (24,689)
    
 (27,353)
    
 (78,677)
    
 (85,458)
Interest and other investment income
    
 5 
    
 908 
    
 563 
    
 2,216 
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
    
 3,135 
    
 (1,268)
    
 (2,723)
    
 (2,060)
Realized gains (losses) on disposition of rental property, net
    
 18,718 
    
 264 
    
 53,261 
    
 54,848 
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
    
 -
    
 -
    
 6,448 
    
 -
Total other (expense) income
    
 (2,831)
    
 (27,449)
    
 (21,128)
    
 (30,454)
Net income (loss)
    
 (142,141)
    
 2,085 
    
 (106,077)
    
 41,804 
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
    
 (281)
    
 145 
    
 582 
    
 757 
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
    
 15,530 
    
 (248)
    
 11,461 
    
 (4,754)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  
$
 (126,892)
  
$
 1,982 
  
$
 (94,034)
  
$
 37,807 
                         
Basic earnings per common share:
                        
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  
$
 (1.42)
  
$
 0.02 
  
$
 (1.05)
  
$
 0.43 
                         
Diluted earnings per common share:
                        
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  
$
 (1.42)
  
$
 0.02 
  
$
 (1.05)
  
$
 0.43 
                         
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    
 89,249 
    
 88,875 
    
 89,229 
    
 88,621 
                         
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    
 100,172 
    
 100,052 
    
 100,236 
    
 100,014 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
5
 

 
MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (in thousands) (unaudited)
                                   
                                   
         
Additional
    
Dividends in
    
Noncontrolling
      
   
              Common Stock
    
Paid-In
    
Excess of
  
Interests
    
Total
   
Shares
    
Par Value
    
Capital
    
Net Earnings
    
in Subsidiaries
    
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2015
  
 89,077
  
$
 891
  
$
 2,560,183
  
$
 (936,293)
  
$
 257,230
  
$
 1,882,011
Net income (loss)
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (94,034)
    
 (12,043)
    
 (106,077)
Common stock dividends
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (40,129)
    
 -
    
 (40,129)
Common unit distributions
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (4,927)
    
 (4,927)
Increase in noncontrolling interest
                                  
  in consolidated joint ventures
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 251
    
 251
Redemption of common units
                                  
  for common stock
  
 294
    
 3
    
 5,367
    
 -
    
 (5,370)
    
 -
Shares issued under Dividend
                                  
  Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
  
 2
    
 -
    
 54
    
 -
    
 -
    
 54
Directors' deferred compensation plan
  
 -
    
 -
    
 297
    
 -
    
 -
    
 297
Stock compensation
  
 46
    
 -
    
 1,556
    
 -
    
 -
    
 1,556
Cancellation of shares
  
 (109)
    
 (1)
    
 (2,038)
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (2,039)
Rebalancing of ownership percentage
                                  
  between parent and subsidiaries
  
 -
    
 -
    
 (276)
    
 -
    
 276
    
 -
Balance at September 30, 2015
  
 89,310
  
$
 893
  
$
 2,565,143
  
$
 (1,070,456)
  
$
 235,417
  
$
 1,730,997

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 

 
6
 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) (unaudited)
             
             
     
                 Nine Months Ended
     
                   September 30,
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    
2015
    
2014
Net income (loss)
  
$
 (106,077)
  
$
 41,804 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
            
Operating activities:
            
Depreciation and amortization, including related intangible assets
    
 128,422 
    
 132,698 
Amortization of deferred stock units
    
 297 
    
 309 
Amortization of stock compensation
    
 1,500 
    
 6,439 
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    
 2,846 
    
 2,306 
Amortization of debt discount and mark-to-market
    
 2,791 
    
 5,502 
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures
    
 2,723 
    
 2,060 
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
    
 3,145 
    
 10,974 
Realized (gains) loss on disposition of rental property, net
    
 (53,261)
    
 (54,848)
Realized (gains) loss on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
    
 (6,448)
    
 -
Impairments
    
 164,176 
    
 -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
            
Decrease (increase) in unbilled rents receivable, net
    
 17 
    
 (4,477)
Increase in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets
    
 (23,387)
    
 (28,544)
Increase in accounts receivable, net
    
 (603)
    
 (1,911)
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    
 5,298 
    
 13,565 
Decrease in rents received in advance and security deposits
    
 (4,502)
    
 (5,938)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
    
 7,751 
    
 (4,440)
             
Net cash provided by operating activities
  
$
 124,688 
  
$
 115,499 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
            
Rental property acquisitions and related intangibles
  
$
 (6,057)
  
$
 (46,883)
Rental property additions and improvements
    
 (59,700)
    
 (77,109)
Development of rental property and other related costs
    
 (49,959)
    
 (4,881)
Proceeds from the sales of rental property
    
 81,049 
    
 274,839 
Proceeds from the sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
    
 6,448 
    
 -
Investments in notes receivable
    
 -
    
 (62,276)
Repayment of notes receivable
    
 7,750 
    
 10,250 
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
    
 (68,468)
    
 (57,568)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
    
 4,329 
    
 36,303 
Increase in restricted cash
    
 (5,823)
    
 (6,777)
             
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
  
$
 (90,431)
  
$
 65,898 
             
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
            
Borrowings from revolving credit facility
  
$
 179,000 
  
$
 262,328 
Repayment of revolving credit facility
    
 (144,000)
    
 (262,328)
Repayment of senior unsecured notes
    
 -
    
 (200,000)
Proceeds from mortgages and loans payable
    
 6,193 
    
 28,350 
Repayment of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations
    
 (29,307)
    
 (44,825)
Payment of contingent consideration
    
 -
    
 (5,228)
Payment of financing costs
    
 (98)
    
 (1,021)
Cash from noncontrolling interests
    
 251 
    
 -
Payment of dividends and distributions
    
 (44,979)
    
 (74,851)
             
Net cash used in financing activities
  
$
 (32,940)
  
$
 (297,575)
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  
$
 1,317 
  
$
 (116,178)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    
 29,549 
    
 221,706 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  
$
 30,866 
  
$
 105,528 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

 
7
 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1.    ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

ORGANIZATION
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), is a fully-integrated, self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) providing leasing, management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its properties and third parties.  As of September 30, 2015, the Company owned or had interests in 274 properties, consisting of 146 office and 109 flex properties, totaling approximately 29.7 million square feet, leased to approximately 1,900  commercial tenants, and 19 multi-family rental properties containing  5,644 residential units, plus developable land (collectively, the “Properties”).  The Properties are comprised of 146 office buildings totaling approximately 24.4 million square feet (which include 36 buildings, aggregating approximately 5.6 million square feet owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), 94 office/flex buildings totaling approximately 4.8 million square feet, six industrial/warehouse buildings totaling approximately 387,400 square feet, 19 multi-family properties totaling 5,644 apartments (which include 13 properties aggregating 4,343 apartments owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), five parking/retail properties totaling approximately 121,500 square feet (which include two buildings aggregating 81,500 square feet owned by unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has investment interests), one hotel (which is owned by an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company has an investment interest) and three parcels of land leased to others.  The Properties are located in seven states, primarily in the Northeast, plus the District of Columbia.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), and variable interest entities for which the Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary, if any.  See Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, for the Company’s treatment of unconsolidated joint venture interests.  Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation, provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIEs. Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either: (1) the equity investors (if any) lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity's activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.  The Company consolidates VIEs in which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary.  The primary beneficiary is defined by the entity having both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that, when taken together, most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s performance: and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the VIE that would be significant to the VIE.

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company’s investments in consolidated real estate joint ventures in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary have total real estate assets of $254 million and $242.9 million, respectively, mortgages of $100.7 million and $94.3 million, respectively, and other liabilities of $17.5 million and $15.7 million, respectively. 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform with current period presentation. 
 

2.    SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Rental
Property
Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Costs directly related to the acquisition, development and construction of rental properties are capitalized.  Acquisition–related costs are expensed as incurred.  Capitalized development and construction costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development and construction costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, salaries and other project costs incurred during the period of development.  Capitalized development and construction salaries and related costs approximated $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $3.5 million and $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  Included in total rental property is construction, tenant improvement and development in-progress of $103.1 million and $62.8 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.  Fully-depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.
 
 
 
 
8
 

 
The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the substantial completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities such as routine maintenance and cleanup).  If portions of a rental project are substantially completed and occupied by tenants, or held available for occupancy, and other portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions are accounted for as a separate project.  The Company allocates costs incurred between the portions under construction and the portions substantially completed and held available for occupancy, primarily based on a percentage of the relative square footage of each portion, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portion under construction.

Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Leasehold interests
Remaining lease term
Buildings and improvements
5 to 40 years
Tenant improvements
The shorter of the term of the
 
related lease or useful life
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
5 to 10 years

Upon acquisition of rental property, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.  The Company records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction.  In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.

Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases.  In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
 
 
 
9
 

 
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s rental properties held for use may be impaired.  In addition to identifying any specific circumstances which may affect a property or properties, management considers other criteria for determining which properties may require assessment for potential impairment.  The criteria considered by management include reviewing low leased percentages, significant near-term lease expirations, recently acquired properties, current and historical operating and/or cash flow losses, near-term mortgage debt maturities or other factors that might impact the Company’s intent and ability to hold the property.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Company’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions.  These assumptions are generally based on management’s experience in its local real estate markets and the effects of current market conditions.  The assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved, and actual losses or impairments may be realized in the future.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – Impairments on Properties Held and Used.

Rental Property
 
Held for Sale
When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets.  If, in management’s opinion, the estimated net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established.
 
If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used.  A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell. 

Investments in
Unconsolidated
Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.  The Company applies the equity method by initially recording these investments at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions.  The outside basis portion of the Company’s joint ventures is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the underlying ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Generally, the Company would discontinue applying the equity method when the investment (and any advances) is reduced to zero and would not provide for additional losses unless the Company has guaranteed obligations of the venture or is otherwise committed to providing further financial support for the investee.    If the venture subsequently generates income, the Company only recognizes its share of such income to the extent it exceeds its share of previously unrecognized losses.
 
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired.  An investment is impaired only if management’s estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the value of the investment.  The Company’s estimates of value for each investment (particularly in real estate joint ventures) are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and operating costs.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the values estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be realized, and actual losses or impairment may be realized in the future.  See Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. 
 
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 
  
Cash and Cash
 
Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. 
 
 
Deferred
Financing Costs
Costs incurred in obtaining financing are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related indebtedness. Amortization of such costs is included in interest expense and was $945,000 and $778,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $2,846,000 and $2,306,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  If a financing obligation is extinguished early, any unamortized deferred financing costs are written off and included in gains (losses) from early extinguishment of debt.  No such unamortized costs were written off for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
 
 
Deferred
Leasing Costs
Costs incurred in connection with commercial leases are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases and included in depreciation and amortization.  Unamortized deferred leasing costs are charged to amortization expense upon early termination of the lease.  Certain employees of the Company are compensated for providing leasing services to the Properties.  The portion of such compensation related to commercial leases, which is capitalized and amortized, was approximately $922,000 and $940,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately $2,738,000 and $2,816,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
 
 
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, as applicable.  Each of the Company’s segments consists of a reporting unit. Goodwill is not amortized.  Management performs an annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth quarter and between annual tests, management evaluates the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be fully recoverable.  In its impairment tests of goodwill, management first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value.  If, based on this assessment, management determines that the fair value of the reporting unit is not less than its carrying value, then performing the additional two-step impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized.
 
 
Derivative
Instruments
The Company measures derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, at fair value and records them as an asset or liability, depending on the Company’s rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract.  For derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recorded in earnings.  For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the affected period.
 
 
Revenue
Recognition
Base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.  Unbilled rents receivable represents the cumulative amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with the lease agreements.

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases.  The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.
 
 
 
11
 

 
Escalations and recoveries from tenants are received from tenants for certain costs as provided in the lease agreements.  These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance and other recoverable costs.  See Note 13: Tenant Leases.

Real estate services revenue includes property management, development, construction and leasing commission fees and other services, and payroll and related costs reimbursed from clients.  Fee income derived from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures (which are capitalized by such ventures) are recognized to the extent attributable to the unaffiliated ownership interests.

Parking income includes income from parking spaces leased to tenants and others.

Other income includes income from tenants for additional services arranged for by the Company and income from tenants for early lease terminations.
 
 
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
Management performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if an allowance for doubtful accounts is required based on factors affecting the collectability of the accounts receivable balances. The factors considered by management in determining which individual tenant receivable balances, or aggregate receivable balances, require a collectability allowance include the age of the receivable, the tenant’s payment history, the nature of the charges, any communications regarding the charges and other related information. Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to exercise significant judgment about the timing, frequency and severity of collection losses, which affects the allowance and net income. 
 
 
Income and
Other Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate federal income tax (including alternative minimum tax) on net income that it currently distributes to its shareholders, provided that the Company satisfies certain organizational and operational requirements including the requirement to distribute at least 90 percent of its REIT taxable income (determined by excluding any net capital gains) to its shareholders.  If and to the extent the Company retains and does not distribute any net capital gains, the Company will be required to pay federal, state and local taxes on such net capital gains at the rate applicable to capital gains of a corporation.  The Company has elected to treat certain of its corporate subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (each a “TRS”).  In general, a TRS of the Company may perform additional services for tenants of the Company and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business (except for the operation or management of health care facilities or lodging facilities or the providing to any person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, rights to any brand name under which any lodging facility or health care facility is operated).  A TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax.   The Company has conducted business through its TRS entities for certain property management, development, construction and other related services, as well as to hold a joint venture interest in a hotel and other matters.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had a deferred tax asset related to its TRS activity with a balance of approximately $16.0 million which has been fully reserved for through a valuation allowance.  If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.  The Company is subject to certain state and local taxes.

Pursuant to the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment.  The Company expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which is included in general and administrative expense.

In the normal course of business, the Company or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable.  As of September 30, 2015, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations are generally from the year 2010 forward.
 
 
 
12
 
 
 
 
Earnings
 
Per Share
The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”).  Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower EPS from continuing operations amount.  Shares whose issuance is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain conditions shall be considered outstanding and included in the computation of diluted EPS as follows (i) if all necessary conditions have been satisfied by the end of the period (the events have occurred), those shares shall be included as of the beginning of the period in which the conditions were satisfied (or as of the date of the grant, if later) or (ii) if all necessary conditions have not been satisfied by the end of the period, the number of contingently issuable shares included in diluted EPS shall be based on the number of shares, if any, that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period (for example, the number of shares that would be issuable based on current period earnings or period-end market price) and if the result would be dilutive. Those contingently issuable shares shall be included in the denominator of diluted EPS as of the beginning of the period (or as of the date of the grant, if later).

Dividends and
 
Distributions
Payable
The dividends and distributions payable at September 30, 2015 represents dividends payable to common shareholders (89,310,308 shares) and distributions payable to noncontrolling interest common unitholders of the Operating Partnership (10,790,142 common units) for all such holders of record as of October 5, 2015 with respect to the third quarter 2015.  The third quarter 2015 common stock dividends and common unit distributions of $0.15 per common share and unit were approved by the Board of Directors on September 22, 2015 and paid on October 15, 2015.

The dividends and distributions payable at December 31, 2014 represents dividends payable to common shareholders (88,866,652 shares) and distributions payable to noncontrolling interest common unitholders of the Operating Partnership (11,083,876 common units) for all such holders of record as of January 6, 2015 with respect to the fourth quarter 2014.  The fourth quarter 2014 common stock dividends and common unit distributions of $0.15 per common share and unit were approved by the Board of Directors on December 9, 2014 and paid on January 14, 2015.

Costs Incurred
For Stock
 
Issuances
Costs incurred in connection with the Company’s stock issuances are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

Stock
Compensation
The Company accounts for stock compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation.  These provisions require that the estimated fair value of restricted stock (“Restricted Stock Awards”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance share units (“PSUs”), total stockholder return based performance shares (“TSR”)  and stock options at the grant date be amortized ratably into expense over the appropriate vesting period.  The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $695,000 and $830,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1,500,000 and $5,094,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included $3,150,000 related to the departure of certain executive officers.

Other
 
Comprehensive
 
Income
Other comprehensive income (loss), if any, includes items that are recorded in equity, such as unrealized holding gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale.  There was no difference in other comprehensive income to net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and no accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 
13
 

Fair Value
 
Hierarchy
The standard Fair Value Measurements specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs).  The following summarizes the fair value hierarchy:

·  
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
·  
Level 2: Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals and
·  
Level 3: Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Discontinued
 
Operations
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance related to the reporting of discontinued operation and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity.  This guidance defines a discontinued operation as a component or group of components disposed or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and final result; the guidance states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of a major geographical area of operations, a major line of business, a major equity method investment or other major parts of an entity.  The guidance also provides for additional disclosure requirements in connection with both discontinued operations and other dispositions not qualifying as discontinued operations.  The guidance is effective for all companies for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014.  The guidance applies prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale after the effective date.  All entities could early adopt the guidance for new disposals (or new classifications as held for sale) that had not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company elected to early adopt this standard effective with the interim period beginning January 1, 2014. Prior to January 1, 2014, properties identified as held for sale and/or disposed of were presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented. 

Impact Of
Recently-Issued
Accounting
Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In adopting ASU 2014-09, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. Additionally, this guidance requires improved disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.  ASU 2014-09 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. 

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). The amendments in ASU 2014-12 apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. That is, the employee would be eligible to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved. Current GAAP does not contain explicit guidance on how to account for those share-based payments. ASU 2014-12 is intended to resolve the accounting treatment of such awards. The amendments in ASU 2014-12 are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-12 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. 
 
 
 
14
 
 

 
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, which requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide certain disclosures when it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ended December 31, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation–Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (Topic 810) (“ASU 2015-02”).  ASU 2015-02 updates guidance related to accounting for consolidation of certain limited partnerships. ASU 2015-02 does not add or remove any of the five characteristics that determine if an entity is a VIE; however, it changes the manner in which a reporting entity assesses its ability to make decisions about the entity's activities. Additionally, ASU 2015-02 removes three of the six criteria that must be met for a fee arrangement to not be a VIE and modifies how an entity assesses interests held through related parties. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements when adopted.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest–Imputation of Interest-Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (Subtopic 835-30) (“ASU 2015-03”).  ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts.  The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this update.  Debt issuance costs related to revolving lines of credit are not within the scope of this new guidance. Additionally, in August 2015 the FASB issued guidance expanding the April 2015 update (ASU 2015-15).  It states that, given the absence of authoritative guidance within the update, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset for revolving lines of credit and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line of credit.  This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.  Full retrospective application is required.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements when adopted. 

 
 
3.    RECENT TRANSACTIONS

Acquisitions
On October 23, 2015, the Company signed an agreement to acquire a 196,000 square-foot office property located in Edison, New Jersey, for approximately $53.1 million, subject to certain conditions.  The acquisition is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2015.

On April 1, 2015, the Company acquired vacant land to accommodate a two-phase development of 365 multi-family residential units located in Worcester, Massachusetts (the “CitySquare Project”) for a purchase price of $3.1 million with an additional $1.25 million to be paid (which is accrued as of September 30, 2015), subject to certain conditions, in accordance with the terms of the purchase and sale agreement.  The purchase price for the acquisition was funded primarily through borrowing under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.  The first phase with 237 units started construction in the third quarter 2015 with anticipated initial deliveries in the second quarter 2017.  The second phase, with 128 units, is projected to begin construction in 2017.  Total development costs are estimated to be approximately $92.5 million (of which $7.1 million was incurred by the Company through September 30, 2015).  For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, included in general and administrative expense was approximately $111,000 in transaction costs related to this acquisition.
 
 
 
15
 
 

 
Dispositions
On June 26, 2015, the Company sold its 203,506 square foot office property located at 14 Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey for net sales proceeds of approximately $80 million, with a gain of approximately $24.7 million from the sale.

On June 1, 2015, the Company sold its 25 percent equity interest in Rosewood Lafayette Holdings L.L.C., a joint venture which owns the Highlands at Morristown Station, a 217-unit multi-family property located in Morristown, New Jersey, to its joint venture partner with a gain on the sale of approximately $6.4 million.

On January 15, 2015, the Company sold its 21,600 square foot office/flex property located at 1451 Metropolitan Drive in West Deptford, New Jersey for net sales proceeds of approximately $1.1 million, with a gain of approximately $0.1 million from the sale.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company transferred the deeds for two of its office properties to the lender in satisfaction of its mortgage loan obligations. The properties transferred consisted of 5 Becker Farm Road in Roseland, New Jersey, aggregating 118,343 square feet, which was collateral for a $14.4 million mortgage loan scheduled to mature on May 11, 2016, and 210 Clay Avenue in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, aggregating 121,203 square feet, which was collateral for a $13.8 million mortgage loan also scheduled to mature on May 11, 2016.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company transferred the deeds for two of its office properties to the lender in satisfaction of its mortgage loan obligations. The properties transferred consisted of 4 Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey, aggregating 105,135 square feet, which was collateral for a $14.6 million mortgage loan that matured on August 11, 2014, and 10 Independence Boulevard in Warren, New Jersey, aggregating 120,528 square feet, which was collateral for a $16.9 million mortgage loan that matured on August 11, 2014.   The Company had previously recorded impairment charges on these four properties totaling $25.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded gains on the disposal of these office properties for a total of $18.7 million and $28.4 million, respectively.

On January 1, 2014, the Company early adopted the new discontinued operations accounting standard and as the properties disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 will not represent a strategic shift (as the Company is not entirely exiting markets or property types), they have not been reflected as part of discontinued operations.

The following table summarizes income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 from the properties disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the 16 properties sold during the year ended December 31, 2014: (dollars in thousands)
                         
     
              Three Months Ended
    
              Nine Months Ended
       
  September 30,
      
  September 30,
     
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Total revenues
  
$
 225
  
$
 8,891
  
$
 9,118
  
$
 48,196
Operating and other expenses
    
 (700)
    
 (3,627)
    
 (4,136)
    
 (22,576)
Depreciation and amortization
    
 (3,585)
    
 (1,363)
    
 (7,509)
    
 (9,178)
Interest expense
    
 (1,146)
    
 (2,588)
    
 (6,374)
    
 (7,795)
                         
Income (loss) from properties disposed of
  
$
 (5,206)
  
$
 1,313
  
$
 (8,901)
  
$
 8,647
                         
Realized gains on dispositions
    
 18,718
    
 264
    
 53,261
    
 54,848
                         
Total income from properties disposed of
  
$
 13,512
  
$
 1,577
  
$
 44,360
  
$
 63,495

Impairments on Properties Held and Used
In September 2015, the Company announced a three-year strategic initiative to transform the Company into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties.  In connection with the transformation of the Company’s portfolio, management began developing a disposition plan in September 2015, which will be an ongoing assessment process.  Through this plan, the Company, in the coming years, expects to dispose of primarily office properties considered non-core to its ongoing operations.  As a result, at September 30, 2015, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying values of these non-core properties, and determined that due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership, it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of 22 rental properties to their estimated fair values.  Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $158.6 million at September 30, 2015 reducing the aggregate carrying values of these properties from $554.3 million to their estimated fair values of $395.7 million.

 
16
 


Four of the Company’s office properties are collateral for a mortgage loan that matured on August 11, 2014, with a principal balance of $65.0 million as of September 30, 2015.  The loan was not repaid at maturity and the Company is in discussions with the lender regarding potential options in satisfaction of the obligation (see Note 9: Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations).   As of September 30, 2015, the Company estimated that the carrying value of three of these properties, aggregating 479,877 square feet and located in Roseland and Parsippany, New Jersey, may not be recoverable over their anticipated holding periods.  In order to reduce the carrying values of the properties to their estimated fair values, the Company recorded impairment charges of $5.6 million at September 30, 2015, which resulted from the current decline in leasing activity and market rents of the properties identified.   The Company had previously recorded impairment charges on these properties at September 30, 2013 of $12.5 million.

Appointment of executive officers
On June 3, 2015, the Company announced the appointments of Mitchell E. Rudin as chief executive officer and Michael J. DeMarco as president and chief operating officer of the Company, effective immediately.  The Company entered into employment agreements dated June 3, 2015 with each of Messrs. Rudin and DeMarco (together, the “Executive Employment Agreements”) that each provide as follows:

·  
A term that ends on December 31, 2018 (the “Employment Term”) unless earlier terminated;
·  
An annual base salary for each of Messrs. Rudin and DeMarco of $700,000, subject to potential merit increases (but not decreases) each year;
·  
A target annual bonus opportunity of one hundred percent (100%) of base salary, or $700,000, for each of Messrs. Rudin and DeMarco, with a threshold bonus of fifty percent (50%) of base salary, or $350,000, and a maximum bonus of two hundred percent (200%) of base salary, or $1,400,000, a pro rata bonus opportunity for 2015 based on the assessment of the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors (“Committee”) of each executive’s development of a strategic plan for the Company and bonuses for 2016 and subsequent years to be based on objective performance goals to be established annually by the Committee;
·  
2015 long-term incentive (“LTI”) awards under the Company’s 2013 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2015 LTI Awards”), consisting of the granting to each of Messrs. Rudin and DeMarco on June 5, 2015 of 18,775.27 restricted stock units subject to time-based vesting over three years, and of 56,325.82 performance share units (“PSUs”) which will vest from 0 to 150 percent of the number of PSUs granted based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a peer group of equity office REITs over a three-year performance period; and
·  
The grant on June 5, 2015 (the “Grant Date”) to each of Messrs. Rudin and DeMarco of options to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable for a period of ten years with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on the Grant Date (which price was $17.31 per share), with 200,000 of such options vesting in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the Grant Date, and 200,000 of such options vesting if the Company’s common stock trades at or above $25.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days while Mr. Rudin and Mr. DeMarco is employed, as applicable, or on or before June 30, 2019 if Mr. Rudin and Mr. DeMarco is employed for the entire Employment Term (except if the executive’s employment has been terminated by the Company for cause following expiration of the Employment Term). 
 

4.    INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had an aggregate investment of approximately $299.5 million in its equity method joint ventures.  The Company formed these ventures with unaffiliated third parties, or acquired interests in them, to develop or manage primarily office and multi-family rental properties, or to acquire land in anticipation of possible development of office and multi-family rental properties.  As of September 30, 2015, the unconsolidated joint ventures owned: 36 office and two retail properties aggregating approximately 5.7 million square feet, 13 multi-family properties totaling 4,343 apartments, a 350-room hotel, development projects for up to approximately 1,074 apartments; and interests and/or rights to developable land parcels able to accommodate up to 2,910 apartments and 1.4 million square feet of office space.  The Company’s unconsolidated interests range from 7.5 percent to 85 percent subject to specified priority allocations in certain of the joint ventures.

On October 23, 2012, the Company acquired the real estate development and management businesses (the “Roseland Business”) of Roseland Partners, L.L.C. (“Roseland Partners”), a premier multi-family rental community developer and manager based in Short Hills, New Jersey, and the Roseland Partners’ interests (the “Roseland Transaction”), principally through unconsolidated joint venture interests in various entities which, directly or indirectly, own or have rights with respect to various residential and/or commercial properties or vacant land (collectively, the “Roseland Assets”).  The locations of the properties extend from New Jersey to Massachusetts, with the majority of the properties located in New Jersey.  Certain of the entities which own the Roseland Assets are controlled by the Company upon acquisition and are therefore consolidated. However, many of the entities are not controlled by the Company and, therefore, are accounted for under the equity method as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
 
 
 
17
 
 

 
The amounts reflected in the following tables (except for the Company’s share of equity in earnings) are based on the historical financial information of the individual joint ventures.  The Company does not record losses of the joint ventures in excess of its investment balances unless the Company is liable for the obligations of the joint venture or is otherwise committed to provide financial support to the joint venture.  The outside basis portion of the Company’s investments in joint ventures is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the underlying ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Unless otherwise noted below, the debt of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures generally is non-recourse to the Company, except for customary exceptions pertaining to such matters as intentional misuse of funds, environmental conditions, and material misrepresentations.

The Company has agreed to guarantee repayment of a portion of the debt of its unconsolidated joint ventures.  As of September 30, 2015, such debt had a total facility amount of $453.6 million of which the Company agreed to guarantee up to $62 million.  As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding balance of such debt totaled $268.3 million of which $53.1 million was guaranteed by the Company.  The Company also posted a $3.6 million letter of credit in support of the South Pier at Harborside joint venture, half of which is indemnified by Hyatt Corporation, the Company’s joint venture partner.  The Company performed management, leasing, development and other services for the properties owned by the unconsolidated joint ventures and recognized $1.3 million and $1.9 million for such services in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $4.4 million and $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which are included in real estate services revenue for the periods presented.  The Company had $0.7 million and $1.0 million in accounts receivable due from its unconsolidated joint ventures as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Included in the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of September 30, 2015 are five unconsolidated development joint ventures, which are VIEs for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary.  These joint ventures are primarily established to develop real estate property for long-term investment and were deemed VIEs primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk was not sufficient to permit the entities to finance their activities without additional financial support.  The initial equity contributed to these entities was not sufficient to fully finance the real estate construction as development costs are funded by the partners throughout the construction period.  The Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs based on the fact that the Company has shared control of these entities along with the entity’s partners and therefore does not have controlling financial interests in these VIEs.  The Company’s aggregate investment in these VIEs was approximately $168.4 million as of September 30, 2015.  The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these VIEs is estimated to be approximately $202.1 million, which includes the Company’s current investment and estimated future funding commitments/guarantees of approximately $33.7 million.  The Company has not provided financial support to these VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide.  In general, future costs of development not financed through third party will be funded with capital contributions from the Company and its outside partners in accordance with their respective ownership percentages.   




 
18
 

The following is a summary of the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014: (dollars in thousands, including footnotes)

                                   
                         
Property Debt
  
 
Number of
Company's
    
Carrying Value
    
As of September 30, 2015
  
 
Apartment Units
Effective
    
September 30,
    
December 31,
      
Maturity
Interest
  
Entity / Property Name
or Square Feet (sf)
Ownership % (a)
    
2015
    
2014
    
Balance
Date
Rate
  
Multi-family
                                  
Marbella RoseGarden, L.L.C./ Marbella  (b)
 412
units
 24.27
%
  
$
 15,686
  
$
 15,779
  
$
 95,000
05/01/18
 4.99
%
  
RoseGarden Monaco Holdings, L.L.C./ Monaco   (b)
 523
units
 15.00
%
    
 1,237
    
 2,161
    
 165,000
02/01/21
 4.19
%
  
Rosewood Lafayette Holdings, L.L.C./ Highlands at Morristown Station (c)
 217
units
 25.00
%
    
 -
    
 62
    
 -
 -
-
    
PruRose Port Imperial South 15, LLC /RiversEdge at Port Imperial (b)
 236
units
 50.00
%
    
 -
    
 -
    
 57,500
09/01/20
 4.32
%
  
Rosewood Morristown, L.L.C. / Metropolitan at 40 Park  (d) (e)
 130
units
 12.50
%
    
 5,810
    
 6,029
    
 46,206
(f)
(f)
    
Overlook Ridge JV 2C/3B, L.L.C./The Chase at Overlook Ridge  (b)
 371
units
 50.00
%
    
 2,261
    
 2,524
    
 52,662
12/26/15
L+2.50
%
(g)
PruRose Riverwalk G, L.L.C./ RiverTrace at Port Imperial   (b)
 316
units
 25.00
%
    
 274
    
 955
    
 79,380
07/15/21
 6.00
%
(h)
Elmajo Urban Renewal Associates, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg A&C)  (b)
 355
units
 7.50
%
    
 -
    
 -
    
 128,100
03/01/30
 4.00
%
(i)
Crystal House Apartments Investors LLC / Crystal House  (j)
 798
units
 25.00
%
    
 27,716
    
 27,051
    
 165,000
04/01/20
 3.17
%
  
Portside Master Company, L.L.C./ Portside at Pier One - Bldg 7  (b)
 176
units
 38.25
%
    
 -
    
 1,747
    
 42,336
12/04/15
L+2.50
%
(k)
PruRose Port Imperial South 13, LLC / RiverParc at Port Imperial  (b)
 280
units
 20.00
%
    
 -
    
 1,087
    
 69,916
06/27/16
L+2.15
%
(l)
Roseland/Port Imperial Partners, L.P./ Riverwalk C  (b) (m)
 363
units
 20.00
%
    
 1,678
    
 1,800
    
 -
-
-
    
RoseGarden Marbella South, L.L.C./ Marbella II
 311
units
 24.27
%
    
 15,946
    
 11,282
    
 63,627
03/30/17
L+2.25
%
(n)
Estuary Urban Renewal Unit B, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg B)  (b)
 227
units
 7.50
%
    
 -
    
 -
    
 81,900
03/01/30
 4.00
%
(o)
Riverpark at Harrison I, L.L.C./ Riverpark at Harrison
 141
units
 45.00
%
    
 2,575
    
 4,744
    
 30,000
08/01/25
 3.70
%
(p)
Capitol Place Mezz LLC / Station Townhouses
 378
units
 50.00
%
    
 47,156
    
 49,327
    
 94,671
07/01/33
 4.82
%
(q)
Harborside Unit A Urban Renewal, L.L.C. / URL Harborside
 763
units
 85.00
%
    
 95,978
    
 34,954
    
 22,916
08/01/29
 5.197
%
(r)
RoseGarden Monaco, L.L.C./ San Remo Land
 250
potential units
 41.67
%
    
 1,325
    
 1,283
    
 -
-
-
    
Grand Jersey Waterfront URA, L.L.C./ Liberty Landing
 850
potential units
 50.00
%
    
 337
    
 337
    
 -
-
-
    
                                   
Office
                                  
Red Bank Corporate Plaza, L.L.C./ Red Bank
 92,878
sf
 50.00
%
    
 4,073
    
 3,963
    
 15,310
05/17/16
L+3.00
%
(s)
12 Vreeland Associates, L.L.C./ 12 Vreeland Road
 139,750
sf
 50.00
%
    
 5,730
    
 5,620
    
 12,912
07/01/23
 2.87
%
  
BNES Associates III / Offices at Crystal Lake
 106,345
sf
 31.25
%
    
 2,126
    
 1,993
    
 6,292
11/01/23
 4.76
%
  
Hillsborough 206 Holdings, L.L.C./ Hillsborough 206
 160,000
sf
 50.00
%
    
 1,962
    
 1,962
    
 -
-
-
    
KPG-P 100 IMW JV, LLC / 100 Independence Mall West
 339,615
sf
 33.33
%
    
 -
    
 -
    
 61,500
09/09/16
L+7.00
%
(t)
Keystone-Penn
 1,842,820
sf
(u)
      
 -
    
 -
    
 223,546
(v)
(v)
    
Keystone-TriState
 1,266,384
sf
(w)
      
 4,376
    
 6,140
    
 206,878
(x)
(x)
    
KPG-MCG Curtis JV, L.L.C./ Curtis Center  (y)
 885,000
sf
 50.00
%
    
 56,441
    
 59,911
    
(z)
(z)
(z)
    
                                   
Other
                                  
Plaza VIII & IX Associates, L.L.C./ Vacant land (parking operations)
 1,225,000
sf
 50.00
%
    
 3,969
    
 4,022
    
 -
-
-
    
Roseland/North Retail, L.L.C./ Riverwalk at Port Imperial  (b)
 30,745
sf
 20.00
%
    
 1,776
    
 1,828
    
 -
-
-
    
South Pier at Harborside / Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson
 350
rooms
 50.00
%
    
(aa)
    
(aa)
    
 64,092
(ab)
(ab)
    
Stamford SM LLC / Senior Mezzanine Loan  (ac)
n/a
n/a
 80.00
%
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
-
-
    
Other (ad)
            
 1,054
    
 907
    
 -
-
-
    
Totals:
          
$
 299,486
  
$
 247,468
  
$
 1,784,744
        



   
   
(a)      
Company's effective ownership % represents the Company's entitlement to residual distributions after payments of priority returns, where applicable.
(b)      
The Company's ownership interests in this venture are subordinate to its partner's preferred capital balance and the Company is not expected to meaningfully participate in the venture's cash flows in the near term.
(c)      
See discussion in Recent Transactions following in this footnote for disposition of Company's interest in the unconsolidated joint ventures.
(d)      
Through the joint venture, the Company also owns a 12.5 percent interest in a 50,973 square feet retail building ("Shops at 40 Park") and a 25 percent interest in a to-be-built 59-unit, five story multi-family rental development property ("Lofts at 40 Park").
(e)      
The Company's ownership interests in this venture are subordinate to its partner's preferred capital balance and the payment of the outstanding balance remaining on a note ($975 as of September 30, 2015), and is not expected to meaningfully participate in the venture's cash flows in the near term.
(f)      
Property debt balance consists of: (i) a loan, collateralized by the Metropolitan at 40 Park, with a balance of $38,600, bears interest at 3.25 percent, matures in September 2020 and is interest only through September 2015; (ii) an amortizable loan, collateralized by the Shops at 40 Park, with a balance of $6,489, bears interest at 3.63 percent, matures in August 2018; and (iii) a loan, collateralized by the Lofts at 40 Park, with a balance of $1,117, bears interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points and matures in September 2016.  The Shops at 40 Park mortgage loan also provides for additional borrowing proceeds of $1 million based on certain preferred thresholds being achieved.
(g)      
The construction loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $55,500 and provides, subject to certain conditions, two one-year extension options with a fee of 25 basis points each.  The joint venture has a swap agreement that fixes the all-in rate to 3.0875 percent per annum on an initial notional amount of $1,840, increasing to $52,000, for the period from September 3, 2013 to November 2, 2015.
(h)       
The permanent loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $80,249.
(i)       
The construction loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $91,000 converted to a permanent loan on February 27, 2015.
(j)      
The Company also owns a 50 percent interest in a vacant land to accommodate the development of approximately 295 additional units of which 252 are currently approved.
(k)       
The construction loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $42,500 and provides, subject to certain conditions, two two-year extension options with a fee of 12.5 basis points for the first two-year extension and 25 basis points for the second two-year extension.
(l)     
The construction loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $73,350 and provides, subject to certain conditions, one-year extension option followed by a six-month extension option with a fee of 25 basis points each. The joint venture has a swap agreement that fixes the all-in rate to 2.79 percent per annum on an initial notional amount of $1,620, increasing to $69,500 for the period from July 1, 2013 to January 1, 2016.
(m)      
The Company also owns a 20 percent residual interest in undeveloped land parcels: parcels 6, I, and J ("Port Imperial North Land") that can accommodate the development of 836 apartment units.
(n)      
The construction loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $77,400 and provides, subject to certain conditions, two one-year extension options with a fee of 25 basis points for each year.
(o)      
The construction loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $57,000 converted to a permanent loan on February 27, 2015.
(p)      
The construction loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $23,400 converted to a permanent loan on July 14, 2015.  See discussion in Recent Transactions following in this footnote.
(q)       
The construction/permanent loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $100,700 with amortization starting in August 2017.
(r)    
The construction/permanent loan has a maximum borrowing amount of $192,000.
(s)      
The joint venture has a swap agreement that fixes the all-in rate to 3.99375 percent per annum on an initial notional amount of $13,650 and then adjusting in accordance with an amortization schedule, which is effective from October 17, 2011 through loan maturity.
(t)       
The mortgage loan has two one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions, and includes a $25 million construction escrow with a balance of $0.5 million to be drawn at September 30, 2015.
(u)      
The Company’s equity interests in the joint ventures will be subordinated to Keystone Entities receiving a 15 percent internal rate of return (“IRR”) after which the Company will receive a 10 percent IRR on its subordinate equity and then all profit will be split equally.  See discussion in Recent Transactions following in this footnote.
(v)      
Principal balance of $127,600 bears interest at 5.114 percent and matures in August 27, 2023; principal balance of $85,521 bears interest at rates ranging from LIBOR+5.0 percent to LIBOR+5.75 percent and matures in August 27, 2016; principal balance of $10,425 bears interest at LIBOR+6.0 percent matures in August 27, 2015.
(w)     
Includes the Company’s pari-passu interests of $4.4 million in five properties and Company’s subordinated equity interests to Keystone Entities receiving a 15 percent internal rate of return (“IRR”) after which the Company will receive a 10 percent IRR on its subordinate equity and then all profit will be split equally.
(x)      
Principal balance of $41,849 bears interest at 4.95 percent and matures on July 1, 2017; principal balance of $72,329 bears interest at rates ranging from 5.65 percent to 6.75 percent and matures on September 9, 2017; principal balance of $14,250 bears interest at 4.88 percent and matures on July 6, 2024; principal balance of $63,400 bears interest at 4.93 percent and matures on July 6, 2044; principal balance of $15,050 bears interest at 4.71 percent and matures on August 6, 2044.
(y)
Includes undivided interests in the same manner as investments in noncontrolling partnership, pursuant to ASC 970-323-25-12.
(z)
See Note 9: Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations for debt secured by interests in these assets.
(aa)
The negative carrying value for this venture of $1,419 and $1,854 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, were included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities.
(ab)      
Balance includes: (i) mortgage loan, collateralized by the hotel property, with a balance of $60,498, bears interest at 6.15 percent and matures in November 2016, and (ii) loan with a balance of $3,594, bears interest at fixed rates ranging from 6.09 percent to 6.62 percent and matures in August 1, 2020.  The Company posted a $3.6 million letter of credit in support of this loan, half of which is indemnified by the partner.
(ac)      
The joint venture collected net proceeds of $47.2 million at maturity, of which the Company received its share of $37.8 million on August 6, 2014.
(ad)
The Company owns other interests in various unconsolidated joint ventures, including interests in assets previously owned and interest in ventures whose businesses are related to its core operations. These ventures are not expected to significantly impact the Company's operations in the near term. 

 
 
 
19
 
 

 
The following is a summary of the Company’s equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (dollars in thousands)
                       
   
                  Three Months Ended
    
                   Nine Months Ended
     
    September 30,
      
     September 30,
Entity / Property Name
  
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Multi-family
                      
Marbella RoseGarden, L.L.C./ Marbella
$
 64
  
$
 3
  
$
 186
  
$
 (13)
RoseGarden Monaco Holdings, L.L.C./ Monaco
  
 (295)
    
 (249)
    
 (924)
    
 (764)
Rosewood Lafayette Holdings, L.L.C./ Highlands at Morristown Station
  
 -
    
 (221)
    
 (62)
    
 (639)
PruRose Port Imperial South 15, LLC /RiversEdge at Port Imperial
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
Rosewood Morristown, L.L.C. / Metropolitan at 40 Park
  
 (93)
    
 (90)
    
 (277)
    
 (264)
Overlook Ridge JV 2C/3B, L.L.C./The Chase at Overlook Ridge
  
 (16)
    
 (217)
    
 (263)
    
 (155)
PruRose Riverwalk G, L.L.C./ RiverTrace at Port Imperial
  
 (151)
    
 (615)
    
 (681)
    
 (1,766)
Elmajo Urban Renewal Associates, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg A&C)
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (203)
Crystal House Apartments Investors LLC / Crystal House
  
 (44)
    
 68
    
 (41)
    
 (206)
Portside Master Company, L.L.C./ Portside at Pier One - Bldg 7
  
 (379)
    
 (228)
    
 (1,736)
    
 (661)
PruRose Port Imperial South 13, LLC / RiverParc at Port Imperial
  
 (257)
    
 (220)
    
 (988)
    
 (638)
Roseland/Port Imperial Partners, L.P./ Riverwalk C
  
 (85)
    
 (173)
    
 (394)
    
 (518)
RoseGarden Marbella South, L.L.C./ Marbella II
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
Estuary Urban Renewal Unit B, LLC / Lincoln Harbor (Bldg B)
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (15)
Riverpark at Harrison I, L.L.C./ Riverpark at Harrison
  
 (54)
    
 -
    
 (377)
    
 -
Capitol Place Mezz LLC / Station Townhouses
  
 (1,454)
    
 -
    
 (2,642)
    
 -
Harborside Unit A Urban Renewal, L.L.C. / URL Harborside
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 (212)
RoseGarden Monaco, L.L.C./ San Remo Land
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
Grand Jersey Waterfront URA, L.L.C./ Liberty Landing
  
 (12)
    
 -
    
 (32)
    
 (54)
Office
                      
Red Bank Corporate Plaza, L.L.C./ Red Bank
  
 110 
    
 101
    
 332
    
 306
12 Vreeland Associates, L.L.C./ 12 Vreeland Road
  
 38 
    
 22
    
 110
    
 165
BNES Associates III / Offices at Crystal Lake
  
 13 
    
 127
    
 133
    
 273
Hillsborough 206 Holdings, L.L.C./ Hillsborough 206
  
 -
    
 -
    
 (5)
    
 (5)
KPG-P 100 IMW JV, LLC / 100 Independence Mall West
  
 (37)
    
 (412)
    
 (800)
    
 (1,548)
Keystone-Penn
  
 3,663
    
 -
    
 3,663
    
 -
Keystone-TriState
  
 (173)
    
 (733)
    
 (1,763)
    
 (733)
KPG-MCG Curtis JV, L.L.C./ Curtis Center
  
 327
    
 113
    
 755
    
 364
Other
                      
Plaza VIII & IX Associates, L.L.C./ Vacant land (parking operations)
  
 102
    
 74
    
 258
    
 220
Roseland/North Retail, L.L.C./ Riverwalk at Port Imperial
  
 (17)
    
 (34)
    
 (52)
    
 (81)
South Pier at Harborside / Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson
  
 1,151
    
 583
    
 1,934
    
 1,874
Stamford SM LLC / Senior Mezzanine Loan
  
 -
    
 493
    
 -
    
 2,337
Other
  
 734
    
 340
    
 943
    
 876
Company's equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
$
 3,135
  
$
 (1,268)
  
$
 (2,723)
  
$
 (2,060)

The following is a summary of the financial position of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company had investment interests as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014: (dollars in thousands)
             
     
September 30,
    
December 31,
     
2015
    
2014
Assets:
            
   Rental property, net
  
$
 1,602,899
  
$
 1,534,812 
   Other assets
    
 460,762
    
 398,222 
   Total assets
  
$
 2,063,661
  
$
 1,933,034 
Liabilities and partners'/
            
members' capital:
            
   Mortgages and loans payable
  
$
 1,246,582
  
$
 1,060,020 
   Other liabilities
    
 228,045
    
 211,340 
   Partners'/members' capital
    
 589,034
    
 661,674 
   Total liabilities and
            
   partners'/members' capital
  
$
 2,063,661
  
$
 1,933,034 
 
 

 
20
 

The following is a summary of the results from operations of the unconsolidated joint ventures for the period in which the Company had investment interests during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: (dollars in thousands)
                       
   
         Three Months Ended
    
         Nine Months Ended
     
  September 30,
      
  September 30,
   
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Total revenues
$
 82,586
  
$
 80,711 
  
$
 238,138
  
$
 224,822 
Operating and other expenses
  
 (55,969)
    
 (58,684)
    
 (169,278)
    
 (173,642)
Depreciation and amortization
  
 (16,823)
    
 (15,134)
    
 (51,632)
    
 (31,715)
Interest expense
  
 (14,622)
    
 (11,296)
    
 (39,280)
    
 (26,423)
Net loss
$
 (4,828)
  
$
 (4,403)
  
$
 (22,052)
  
$
 (6,958)

Recent Transactions
KEYSTONE-PENN
On August 28, 2015, Rosetree KPG III, L.L.C., which owns a 236,417 square-foot two-building office property located in Media, Pennsylvania refinanced its $31.8 million loan and obtained a new $45.5 million mortgage loan. The Company received a distribution of $3.7 million as its share of the loan proceeds recognized as equity in earnings during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (as a result of having no carrying value of its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture).

RIVERPARK AT HARRISON I, L.L.C./RIVERPARK AT HARRISON
On July 14, 2015, Riverpark at Harrison I, L.L.C. (“Riverpark”), which owns a 141-unit multi-family rental property located in Harrison, New Jersey, refinanced the $23.4 million construction loan, and obtained a $30 million mortgage loan. The Company received a distribution of $1.7 million from the loan proceeds. Concurrent with the loan refinancing, the Company, which holds a 36 percent interest in Riverpark, and its venture partners that hold ownership interests aggregating 44 percent acquired the 20 percent interest of the remaining partner group for $2.1 million.  As a result of the 20 percent redemption, the Company’s ownership interest increased to 45 percent with the remaining venture partners owning 55 percent.  The Company has determined that the joint venture is not a VIE since the equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit Riverpark to finance its activities without additional financial support.  As control is shared with the partners in accordance with the operating agreement, the Company will continue to have an unconsolidated joint venture interest in Riverpark under the provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation.

ROSEWOOD LAFAYETTE HOLDINGS, L.L.C./HIGHLANDS AT MORRISTOWN STATION
On June 1, 2015, the Company sold its 25 percent equity interest in Rosewood Lafayette Holdings L.L.C., a joint venture which owns the Highlands at Morristown Station, a 217-unit multi-family property located in Morristown, New Jersey, to its joint venture partner and realized a gain on the sale of $6.4 million.

OVERLOOK RIDGE JV, LLC/QUARRYSTONE AT OVERLOOK RIDGE
On May 13, 2015, LR Overlook Phase II, LLC, of which the Company held a 50 percent interest, sold its 251-unit multi-family rental property located in Malden, Massachusetts (“Quarrystone Property”) for approximately $74.6 million.  The Company received no share of the distributable cash from the sale as the Company’s equity interest in the venture is subordinated to its joint venture partner, and realized no gain or loss from the sale.
  

5.    DEFERRED CHARGES, GOODWILL AND OTHER ASSETS, NET
           
   
September 30,
    
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
  
2015
    
2014
Deferred leasing costs
$
 232,291
  
$
 239,138
Deferred financing costs
  
 20,823
    
 24,042
   
 253,114
    
 263,180
Accumulated amortization
  
 (119,965)
    
 (122,358)
Deferred charges, net
  
 133,149
    
 140,822
Notes receivable (a)
  
 13,557
    
 21,491
In-place lease values, related intangibles and other assets, net
  
 4,936
    
 6,565
Goodwill
  
 2,945
    
 2,945
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net
  
 46,136
    
 32,827
           
Total deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net
$
 200,723
  
$
 204,650

(a)
Includes as of September 30, 2015: a mortgage receivable for $10.4 million which bears interest at LIBOR plus six percent and matures in August 2016; and an interest-free note receivable with a net present value of $3.1 million and matures in April 2023.  The Company believes these balances are fully collectible.
 
 
 
 
21
 

 
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company does not have any derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.  The following table summarizes the notional and fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments, designated as fair value hedges, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

                                 
                       
         Fair Value
   
Notional
    
Strike
    
Effective
  
Expiration
    
September 30,
    
December 31,
   
Value
(a)
  
Rate
    
Date
  
Date
    
2015
    
2014
LIBOR Cap
$
 51,000 
    
1.5
%
  
September 2014
  
October 2015
  
$
 -
  
$
 1 
LIBOR Cap
  
 24,000 
    
1.5
%
  
September 2014
  
October 2015
    
 -
    
 1 
LIBOR Cap
  
 51,000 
    
1.75
%
  
October 2015
  
October 2016
    
 2
    
 64 
LIBOR Cap
  
 24,000 
    
1.75
%
  
October 2015
  
October 2016
    
 1
    
 29 
                       
$
 3
  
$
 95 
 
(a)  
The notional value is an indication of the extent of our involvement in these instruments at that time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.

The Company includes these derivative financial instruments in deferred charges, goodwill and other assets, net.  As changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments are recorded in earnings, the Company recorded a loss on the change in fair value of $12,000 and $92,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, which is included in interest and other investment income in the consolidated statements of operations.

 
6.    RESTRICTED CASH

Restricted cash generally includes tenant and resident security deposits for certain of the Company’s properties, and escrow and reserve funds for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, capital improvements, tenant improvements, and leasing costs established pursuant to certain mortgage financing arrangements, and is comprised of the following:  (dollars in thousands)
           
   
September 30,
    
December 31,
   
2015
    
2014
Security deposits
$
 7,681
  
$
 7,795
Escrow and other reserve funds
  
 32,387
    
 26,450
           
Total restricted cash
$
 40,068
  
$
 34,245


 
7.    SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES

A summary of the Company’s senior unsecured notes as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows:  (dollars in thousands)

                   
     
September 30,
    
December 31,
  
Effective
  
     
2015
    
2014
  
Rate (1)
  
5.800% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 2016
  
$
 200,029
  
$
 200,086
  
 5.806
%
2.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due  December 15, 2017
    
 249,372
    
 249,150
  
 2.803
%
7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes, due August 15, 2019
    
 249,173
    
 249,013
  
 8.017
%
4.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due April 18, 2022
    
 299,609
    
 299,565
  
 4.612
%
3.150% Senior Unsecured Notes, due May 15, 2023
    
 270,385
    
 269,930
  
 3.517
%
                   
Total senior unsecured notes
  
$
 1,268,568
  
$
 1,267,744
      

(1)
Includes the cost of terminated treasury lock agreements (if any), offering and other transaction costs and the discount/premium on the notes, as applicable.

The terms of the Company’s senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum amount of debt leverage, the maximum amount of secured indebtedness, the minimum amount of debt service coverage and the maximum amount of unsecured debt as a percent of unsecured assets.   The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants under the indenture relating to its senior unsecured notes as of September 30, 2015.
 

 
22
 

8.    UNSECURED REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY

On July 16, 2013, the Company amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of 17 lenders.  The $600 million facility is expandable to $1 billion and matures in July 2017.  It has two six-month extension options each requiring the payment of a 7.5 basis point fee.  The interest rate on outstanding borrowings (not electing the Company’s competitive bid feature) and the facility fee on the current borrowing capacity payable quarterly in arrears are based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
         
Operating Partnership's
  
Interest Rate -
    
Unsecured Debt Ratings:
  
Applicable Basis Points
  
Facility Fee
Higher of S&P or Moody's
  
Above LIBOR
  
Basis Points
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3
  
170.0
  
35.0
BBB- or Baa3 (current)
  
130.0
  
30.0
BBB or Baa2
  
110.0
  
20.0
BBB+ or Baa1
  
100.0
  
15.0
A- or A3 or higher
  
92.5
  
12.5

The facility has a competitive bid feature, which allows the Company to solicit bids from lenders under the facility to borrow up to $300 million at interest rates less than those above.

The terms of the unsecured facility include certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the facility described below, or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the facility, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio (60 percent), the maximum amount of secured indebtedness (40 percent), the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage (1.5 times), the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness (60 percent), the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage (2.0 times) and certain investment limitations (generally 15 percent of total capitalization).  If an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company will not make any excess distributions except to enable the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Code.  The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants under its revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2015.
 
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $35 million under its unsecured revolving credit facility, and had no outstanding borrowings under the facility as of December 31, 2014. 
 

9.   MORTGAGES, LOANS PAYABLE AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

The Company has mortgages, loans payable and other obligations which primarily consist of various loans collateralized by certain of the Company’s rental properties.  As of September 30, 2015, 24 of the Company’s properties, with a total carrying value of approximately $917 million, are encumbered by the Company’s mortgages and loans payable.  Payments on mortgages, loans payable and other obligations are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest, or interest only.  Except as noted below, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants under its mortgages and loans payable as of September 30, 2015.


 
23
 

A summary of the Company’s mortgages, loans payable and other obligations as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows: (dollars in thousands)
                           
     
Effective
      
September 30,
    
December 31,
      
Property Name
Lender
  
Rate (a)
      
2015
    
2014
  
Maturity
  
Overlook - Site IIID,IIIC, IIIA (b)
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
LIBOR+3.50
%
    
 -
  
$
 17,260 
  
-
  
Overlook - Site IIB (Quarrystone I) (b)
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
LIBOR+2.50
%
    
 -
    
 5,787 
  
-
  
10 Independence (c)
Wells Fargo CMBS
  
 10.260 
%
    
 -
    
 16,924 
  
-
  
4 Sylvan (d)
Wells Fargo CMBS
  
 10.260 
%
    
 -
    
 14,575 
  
-
  
210 Clay  (e)
Wells Fargo CMBS
  
 18.100 
%
    
 -
    
 13,330 
  
-
  
5 Becker (f)
Wells Fargo CMBS
  
 19.450 
%
    
 -
    
 13,867 
  
-
  
6 Becker, 85 Livingston,
Wells Fargo CMBS
  
 10.260 
%
  
$
 65,035 
    
 65,035 
  
08/11/14
(h)
75 Livingston &
                          
20 Waterview (g)
                          
9200 Edmonston Road
Principal Commercial Funding L.L.C.
  
 5.534 
%
    
 3,809 
    
 3,951 
  
05/01/15
(i)
Port Imperial South
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
LIBOR+1.75
%
    
 44,771 
    
 44,119 
  
11/18/15
  
4 Becker
Wells Fargo CMBS
  
 9.550 
%
    
 39,914 
    
 39,421 
  
05/11/16
  
Curtis Center (j)
CCRE & PREFG
LIBOR+5.912
%
(m)
  
 64,000 
    
 64,000 
  
10/09/16
  
Various (k)
Prudential Insurance
  
 6.332 
%
    
 144,037 
    
 145,557 
  
01/15/17
  
150 Main St.
Webster Bank
LIBOR+2.35
%
    
 6,568 
    
 1,193 
(o)
03/30/17
  
23 Main Street
JPMorgan CMBS
  
 5.587 
%
    
 28,713 
    
 29,210 
  
09/01/18
  
Harborside Plaza 5
The Northwestern Mutual Life
  
 6.842 
%
    
 218,717 
    
 221,563 
  
11/01/18
  
 
Insurance Co. & New York Life
                        
 
Insurance Co.
                        
100 Walnut Avenue
Guardian Life Insurance Co.
  
 7.311 
%
    
 18,342 
    
 18,542 
  
02/01/19
  
One River Center (l)
Guardian Life Insurance Co.
  
 7.311 
%
    
 42,018 
    
 42,476 
  
02/01/19
  
Park Square
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
LIBOR+1.872
%
(n)
  
 27,500 
    
 27,500 
  
04/10/19
  
Port Imperial South 4/5 Retail
American General Life & A/G PC
  
4.559
%
    
 4,000 
    
 4,000 
  
12/01/21
  
Port Imperial South 4/5 Garage
American General Life & A/G PC
  
4.853
%
    
 32,600 
    
 32,600 
  
12/01/29
  
                           
Total mortgages, loans payable and other obligations
        
$
 740,024 
  
$
 820,910 
      

 
   
(a)
Reflects effective rate of debt, including deferred financing costs, comprised of the cost of terminated treasury lock agreements (if any), debt initiation costs, mark-to-market adjustment of acquired debt and other transaction costs, as applicable.
(b)
On March 27, 2015, the Company repaid these loans at par, using borrowings on the Company's unsecured revolving credit facility.
(c)
On May 27, 2015, the Company transferred the deed for 10 Independence Boulevard to the lender in satisfaction of its obligation.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions.
(d)
On June 11, 2015, the Company transferred the deed for 4 Sylvan Way to the lender in satisfaction of its obligation.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions.
(e)
On July 21, 2015, the Company transferred the deed for 210 Clay to the lender in satisfaction of its obligation.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions.
(f)
On August 24, 2015, the Company transferred the deed for 5 Becker to the lender in satisfaction of its obligation.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions.
(g)
Mortgage is cross collateralized by the four properties.
(h)
The loan was not repaid at maturity and the Company is in discussions with the lender regarding potential options in satisfaction of the obligation.
(i)
Excess cash flow, as defined, is being held by the lender for re-leasing costs.  The deed for the property was placed in escrow and is available to the lender in the event of default or non-payment at maturity.  The mortgage loan was not repaid at maturity on May 1, 2015.  The Company is in discussions with the lender regarding a further extension of the loan.
(j)
The Company owns a 50 percent tenants-in-common interest in the Curtis Center property.  The Company’s $64.0 million loan consists of its 50 percent interest in a $102 million senior loan with a current rate of 3.501 percent at September 30, 2015 and its 50 percent interest in a $26 million mezzanine loan (with a maximum borrowing capacity of $48 million) with a current rate of 9.707 percent at September 30, 2015.  The senior loan rate is based on a floating rate of one-month LIBOR plus 329 basis points and the mezzanine loan rate is based on a floating rate of one-month LIBOR plus 950 basis points.  The Company has entered into LIBOR caps for the periods of the loans.  The loans provide for three one-year extension options.
(k)
Mortgage is cross collateralized by seven properties. The Company has agreed, subject to certain conditions, to guarantee repayment of $61.1 million of the loan. 
(l)
Mortgage is collateralized by the three properties comprising One River Center. 
(m)
The effective interest rate includes amortization of deferred financing costs of 1.362 percent.
(n)
The effective interest rate includes amortization of deferred financing costs of 0.122 percent.
(o)
This construction loan has a maximum borrowing capacity of $28.8 million. 
 
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST AND INTEREST CAPITALIZED
Cash paid for interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $85,019,000 and $92,096,000, respectively.  Interest capitalized by the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $11,744,000 and $10,650,000, respectively (of which these amounts included $3,769,000 and $3,284,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for interest capitalized on the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures which were substantially in development).

SUMMARY OF INDEBTEDNESS
As of September 30, 2015, the Company’s total indebtedness of $2,043,592,000 (weighted average interest rate of 5.41 percent) was comprised of $177,839,000 of revolving credit facility borrowings and other variable rate mortgage debt (weighted average rate of 3.41 percent) and fixed rate debt and other obligations of $1,865,753,000 (weighted average rate of 5.60 percent).
 
 
 
24
 
 

 
As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s total indebtedness of $2,088,654,000 (weighted average interest rate of 5.64 percent) was comprised of $159,860,000 of variable rate mortgage debt (weighted average rate of 3.83 percent) and fixed rate debt and other obligations of $1,928,794,000 (weighted average rate of 5.79 percent). 

 
10.  EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 401(k) PLANS AND DEFERRED RETIREMENT COMPENSATION AGREEMENTS

Employees of the Company, who meet certain minimum age and service requirements, are eligible to participate in the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”).  Eligible employees may elect to defer from one percent up to 60 percent of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis to the 401(k) Plan, subject to certain limitations imposed by federal law.  The amounts contributed by employees are immediately vested and non-forfeitable.  The Company may make discretionary matching or profit sharing contributions to the 401(k) Plan on behalf of eligible participants in any plan year.  The Company did not make any contributions to the 401(k) Plan in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  Participants are always 100 percent vested in their pre-tax contributions and will begin vesting in any matching or profit sharing contributions made on their behalf after two years of service with the Company at a rate of 20 percent per year, becoming 100 percent vested after a total of six years of service with the Company.  All contributions are allocated as a percentage of compensation of the eligible participants for the Plan year.  The assets of the 401(k) Plan are held in trust and a separate account is established for each participant.  A participant may receive a distribution of his or her vested account balance in the 401(k) Plan in a single sum or in installment payments upon his or her termination of service with the Company.  Total expense recognized by the Company for the 401(k) Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was zero and $24,000, respectively, and zero and $77,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

On September 12, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company approved multi-year deferred retirement compensation agreements for those executive officers in place on such date (the “Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreements”).  Pursuant to the Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreements, the Company was to make annual contributions of stock units (“Stock Units”) representing shares of the Company’s common stock on January 1 of each year from 2013 through 2017 into a deferred compensation account maintained on behalf of each participating executive.  Vesting of each annual contribution of Stock Units was to occur on December 31 of each year, subject to continued employment.  In connection with the separation from service to the Company of certain executive officers effective March 31, 2014, the Company agreed to make cash payments totaling $1.2 million for all vested and unvested Stock Units and future cash contributions pursuant to the Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreements.  In connection with the separation from service to the Company of its former president and chief executive officer effective June 30, 2015, the Company agreed to make cash payments of $2.3 million on the separation date for all vested and unvested Stock Units and future cash contributions pursuant to his Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreement.  Total expense recognized by the Company under the Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreements for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was zero and $47,000, respectively, and zero and $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.     

 
11.  DISCLOSURE OF FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The following disclosure of estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value.  Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the assets and liabilities at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.  The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash equivalents, receivables, notes receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, consisting of senior unsecured notes, an unsecured revolving credit facility and mortgages, loans payable and other obligations aggregated approximately $2,067,463,000 and $2,133,214,000 as compared to the book value of approximately $2,043,592,000 and $2,088,654,000 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was categorized as a level 3 basis (as provided by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures).  The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities.  The fair value of the mortgage debt and the unsecured notes was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate.  Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative financial instruments fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivative financial instruments utilize level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. The Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative financial instruments valuations in their entirety are classified in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
 
 
 
25
 

 
The fair value measurements used in the evaluation of the Company’s rental properties are considered to be Level 3 valuations within the fair value hierarchy, as there are significant unobservable inputs. Examples of inputs that were utilized in the fair value calculations include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, and third party broker information. The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements at September 30, 2015 were as follows:

                       
     
Fair Value at
  
Primary
            
     
September 30,
  
Valuation
  
Unobservable
  
Location
  
Range of
Description
    
2015
  
Techniques
  
Inputs
  
Type
  
Rates
Properties held and used on which the Company recognized impairment losses
  
$
 438,606,000
  
Discounted cash flows
  
Discount rate
  
Suburban
  
8%  - 15%
                 
Central Business District
  
6% - 8%
                       
             
Exit Capitalization rate
  
Suburban
  
7.5% - 9%
                 
Central Business District
  
4.6%  - 5.75%
                       
Disclosure about fair value of assets and liabilities is based on pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.  Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since September 30, 2015 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.  

 
12.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENTS
Pursuant to agreements with certain municipalities, the Company is required to make payments in lieu of property taxes (“PILOT”) on certain of its properties and has tax abatement agreements on other properties, as follows:

The Harborside Plaza 4-A agreement with the City of Jersey City, as amended, which commenced in 2002, is for a term of 20 years.  The annual PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs, as defined.  Total Project Costs are $49.5 million.  The PILOT totaled $247,000 and $247,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $742,000 and $742,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The Harborside Plaza 5 agreement, also with the City of Jersey City, as amended, which commenced in 2002, is for a term of 20 years.  The annual PILOT is equal to two percent of Total Project Costs, as defined.  Total Project Costs are $170.9 million.  The PILOT totaled $854,000 and $854,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $2.6 million and $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The agreement with the City of Weehawken for its Port Imperial 4/5 garage development project has a term of five years beginning when the project is substantially complete, which occurred in the third quarter of 2013.  The agreement provides that real estate taxes be paid initially on the land value of the project only and allows for a phase in of real estate taxes on the value of the improvements over a five year period.

The agreement with the City of Rahway for its Park Square multi-family rental property provides that real estate taxes will be partially abated, on a declining scale, for four years through 2015.

At the conclusion of the above-referenced agreements, it is expected that the properties will be assessed by the municipality and be subject to real estate taxes at the then prevailing rates.

LITIGATION
The Company is a defendant in litigation arising in the normal course of its business activities.  Management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a materially adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition taken as whole.


 
26
 

GROUND LEASE AGREEMENTS
Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable ground leases under which the Company is the lessee, as of September 30, 2015, are as follows: (dollars in thousands)
     
Year
  
Amount
October 1 through December 31, 2015
$
 99
2016
  
 387
2017
  
 267
2018
  
 232
2019
  
 235
2020 through 2084
  
 15,583
     
Total
$
 16,803
 
Ground lease expense incurred by the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $102,000 and $102,000, respectively, and $305,000 and $305,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

ROSELAND CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
The purchase price for the Roseland Transaction included the fair value of contingent consideration pursuant to an earn-out (“Earn Out”) agreement of approximately $10 million.  Since the acquisition, the Company recognized charges and benefits related to changes in fair value in the Earn Out liability and, as a result of the achievement of certain of the defined criteria, paid certain amounts such that the balance of the Earn Out as of September 30, 2015 was $1.2 million.  Related to changes in the fair value of the Earn Out liability, the Company recognized a net charge of $219,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and recognized benefits of zero and $380,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.  Prospectively, the Earn Out liability will be remeasured at fair value until the contingency has been resolved, with any changes in fair value representing a charge or benefit directly to earnings (with no adjustment to purchase accounting).  The measures of the Earn Out are based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820 refers to as level 3 inputs.  In addition to an appropriate discount rate, the key assumption affecting the valuation for the Roseland Assets component was the probability of occurrence of the payment events under the relevant provisions (management assumed between 92 and 99 percent for completion/start criteria and 50 percent for the tax credit/grant criteria in its initial valuation).  The valuation of the TRS component includes assumptions for the risk-free rate and various other factors (i.e., stock price, dividend levels and volatility) for the Company and the relevant peer group, as defined in the Earn Out agreement. 

DEPARTURE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
On November 4, 2014, the Company announced that Mitchell E. Hersh would step down as president and chief executive officer of the Company effective May 11, 2015 and would not stand for re-election to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) at the 2015 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.  Pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement, the Company elected to extend the separation date to June 30, 2015 (the “Separation Date”).  In connection with Mr. Hersh’s departure from the Company, the Company and Mr. Hersh entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) dated November 4, 2014 (the “Effective Date”).  The Separation Agreement provided that Mr. Hersh’s employment with the Company was being terminated without cause, and further provided, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Hersh’s employment agreement, multi-year performance award agreement, TSR-based performance award agreement and deferred retirement compensation agreement, for (i) a cash payment to Mr. Hersh of $8 million, (ii) payment of the premiums for the continuation of Mr. Hersh’s health, dental and vision insurance for 48 months following the Separation Date, (iii) vesting of 210,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s multi-year performance award agreement, (iv) a cash payment equal to the sum of (X) $504,000, plus (Y) the product of (1) 210,000 multiplied by (2) the aggregate amount of dividends on the Company’s common stock that were declared and paid between the Effective Date and the Separation Date in payment of accrued but unpaid dividend equivalents pursuant to his multi-year performance award agreement, (v) issuance of 41,811 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Deferred Shares”) pursuant to the acceleration of vesting of 675 performance shares pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s TSR-based performance award agreement, and (vi) a cash payment of $2,311,792 pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s deferred retirement compensation award agreement. All such cash amounts and Deferred Shares will be paid to Mr. Hersh on the date that is six months and one day from the Separation Date, except in the event of death or if the payment event is due to Mr. Hersh’s disability, in which case the payments will occur shortly after such death or disability.  Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Hersh continued to receive his base salary in accordance with his employment agreement and to be eligible to participate in the Company’s executive incentive compensation and bonus programs. In addition, upon departure Mr. Hersh was entitled to receive his accrued but unpaid base salary and to have his expenses reimbursed.
 
The Company’s total estimated costs for the departure of the Company’s former president and chief executive officer and of the departure of certain of the Company’s executive officers of approximately $23.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2014, of which approximately $11 million was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and was included in general and administrative expense (approximately $11.5 million and $11.6 million was included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively).  
 
 
 
27
 
 

 
OTHER
The Company may not dispose of or distribute certain of its properties, currently comprised of seven properties with an aggregate net carrying value of approximately $57.3 million, which were originally contributed by certain unrelated common unitholders, without the express written consent of such common unitholders, as applicable, except in a manner which does not result in recognition of any built-in-gain (which may result in an income tax liability) or which reimburses the appropriate specific common unitholders for the tax consequences of the recognition of such built-in-gains (collectively, the “Property Lock-Ups”).  The aforementioned restrictions do not apply in the event that the Company sells all of its properties or in connection with a sale transaction which the Company’s Board of Directors determines is reasonably necessary to satisfy a material monetary default on any unsecured debt, judgment or liability of the Company or to cure any material monetary default on any mortgage secured by a property.  The Property Lock-Ups expire periodically through 2016.  Upon the expiration of the Property Lock-Ups, the Company is generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent any sale, transfer or other disposition of the subject properties from resulting in the recognition of built-in gain to the specific common unitholders, which include members of the Mack Group (which includes William L. Mack, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors; David S. Mack, director; Earle I. Mack, a former director; and Mitchell E. Hersh, former president, chief executive officer and director), the Robert Martin Group (which includes Robert F. Weinberg, a former director and current member of its Advisory Board), and the Cali Group (which includes John R. Cali, a former director and current member of its Advisory Board).  110 of the Company’s properties, with an aggregate net book value of approximately $1.3 billion, have lapsed restrictions and are subject to these conditions.

In July 2012, the Company entered into a ground lease with Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. (“Wegmans”) at the Company’s undeveloped site located at Sylvan Way and Ridgedale Avenue in Hanover Township, New Jersey.  Subject to receiving all necessary governmental approvals, Wegmans intends to construct a store of approximately 140,000 square feet on a finished pad scheduled to be completed in the first quarter of 2017.  The project is expected to cost approximately $28.7 million to complete (of which, as of September 30, 2015, the Company has incurred $13.9 million of the development costs, and estimates it will need to fund an additional $14.8 million for the completion of the project).

The Company owns a 76.25 percent interest in a consolidated joint venture which is constructing a 108-unit multi-family development rental property located in Eastchester, New York (the “Eastchester Project”).  The project is expected to be ready for occupancy by the second quarter of 2016.  The Eastchester Project is estimated to cost a total of $50 million (of which development costs of $22.7 million have been incurred through September 30, 2015).  The venture has a $28.8 million construction loan (with $6.6 million outstanding as of September 30, 2015).  The Company expects to fund costs of approximately $20.9 million for the development of the project (of which, as of September 30, 2015, the Company has incurred $13.5 million of the development costs and estimates it will need to fund an additional $7.4 million for the completion of the project).

On April 1, 2015, the Company acquired vacant land to accommodate a two-phase development of the CitySquare Project for a purchase price of $3.1 million with an additional $1.25 million to be paid (which is accrued as of September 30, 2015), subject to certain conditions, in accordance with the terms of the purchase and sale agreement.  The purchase price for the acquisition was funded primarily through borrowing under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.  The first phase with 237 units started construction in the third quarter 2015 with anticipated initial deliveries in the second quarter 2017.  The second phase, with 128 units, is projected to begin construction in 2017.  Total development costs are estimated to be approximately $92.5 million (of which $7.1 million was incurred by the Company through September 30, 2015 and estimates it will need to fund an additional $85.4 million for the completion of the project).

On October 6, 2015, the Company entered into a joint venture partnership with XS Port Imperial Hotel, LLC (“XS”) to form XS Hotel Urban Renewal Associates LLC (“XS Hotel URA”) for the development and ownership of a ­­­364-key dual branded hotel property located in Weehawken, New Jersey (“Port Imperial Hotel”).  Concurrently, the Company and XS entered into a separate joint venture partnership to form XS Hotel Associates, L.L.C. (“XS Hotel”) for the management and operations of the completed hotel development.  The Company holds a 90 percent interest and XS holds the remaining 10 percent interest in the consolidated joint ventures, XS Hotel URA and XS Hotel, with the Company having full and complete authority, power, and discretion to manage and control the ventures’ business, affairs, and property.  The construction of the Port Imperial Hotel is estimated to cost a total of $129.6 million, which will be funded by a $94 million construction loan with the balance to be funded with members’ capital.  Upon closing, Mack-Cali’s initial contribution was $27.3 million, which included a capital credit of $23.7 million for its contributed Hotel Condominium Land unit, and XS Hotel’s initial contribution was $3 million.  The Company expects to fund additional costs of approximately $4.8 million.


 
28
 

The Company owns developable land to accommodate a multi-phase development project of approximately 1,034-unit multi-family rental property located in Malden, Massachusetts.  The initial phase commenced construction of 292 units in the third quarter of 2015 (the “Chase II Project”).  The Chase II project is estimated to cost a total of $74.4 million (of which the Company has incurred $12.4 million through September 30, 2015) and is expected to be ready for occupancy by second quarter of 2017.  The Company estimates it will need to fund additional costs of $62 million for the completion of the Chase II Project.     
 

13.  TENANT LEASES

The Properties are leased to tenants under operating leases with various expiration dates through 2035.  Substantially all of the commercial leases provide for annual base rents plus recoveries and escalation charges based upon the tenant’s proportionate share of and/or increases in real estate taxes and certain operating costs, as defined, and the pass-through of charges for electrical usage.

Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable commercial operating leases at September 30, 2015 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

     
Year
  
Amount
October 1 through December 31, 2015
$
 112,433
2016
  
 452,893
2017
  
 410,203
2018
  
 327,024
2019
  
 263,918
2020 and thereafter
  
 1,077,550
     
Total
$
 2,644,021

 
Multi-family rental property residential leases are excluded from the above table as they generally expire within one year.

 
14.  MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

To maintain its qualification as a REIT, not more than 50 percent in value of the outstanding shares of the Company may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of any taxable year of the Company, other than its initial taxable year (defined to include certain entities), applying certain constructive ownership rules.  To help ensure that the Company will not fail this test, the Company’s Charter provides, among other things, certain restrictions on the transfer of common stock to prevent further concentration of stock ownership.  Moreover, to evidence compliance with these requirements, the Company must maintain records that disclose the actual ownership of its outstanding common stock and demands written statements each year from the holders of record of designated percentages of its common stock requesting the disclosure of the beneficial owners of such common stock.

SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
In September 2012, the Board of Directors renewed and authorized an increase to the Company’s repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”).  The Company has authorization to repurchase up to $150 million of its outstanding common stock under the renewed Repurchase Program, which it may repurchase from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing prices or through privately negotiated transactions.  The Company has purchased and retired 394,625 shares of its outstanding common stock for an aggregate cost of approximately $11 million (all of which occurred in the year ended December 31, 2012), with a remaining authorization under the Repurchase Program of $139 million.
 
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”) which commenced in March 1999 under which approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for future issuance.  The DRIP provides for automatic reinvestment of all or a portion of a participant’s dividends from the Company’s shares of common stock.  The DRIP also permits participants to make optional cash investments up to $5,000 a month without restriction and, if the Company waives this limit, for additional amounts subject to certain restrictions and other conditions set forth in the DRIP prospectus filed as part of the Company’s effective registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC for the approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the DRIP.
 
 
 
29
 
 

 
STOCK OPTION PLANS
In May 2013, the Company established the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2013 Plan”) under which a total of 4,600,000 shares have been reserved for issuance.  In May 2004, the Company established the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2004 Plan”) under which a total of 2,500,000 shares had been reserved for issuance.  The 2004 Plan was terminated upon establishment of the 2013 Plan.  No options were granted under the 2004 Plan.  In September 2000, the Company established the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (“2000 Employee Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (“2000 Director Plan” and together with the 2000 Employee Plan, the “2000 Plans”).  In May 2002, shareholders of the Company approved amendments to both of the 2000 Plans to increase the total shares reserved for issuance under both of the 2000 Plans from 2,700,000 to 4,350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (from 2,500,000 to 4,000,000 shares under the 2000 Employee Plan and from 200,000 to 350,000 shares under the 2000 Director Plan).  As the 2000 Plans expired in 2010, stock options may no longer be issued under those plans.  Stock options granted under the 2000 Employee Plan became exercisable over a five-year period.  All stock options granted under the 2000 Director Plan became exercisable in one year.  All options were granted at the fair market value at the dates of grant and have terms of 10 years.  As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the stock options outstanding had a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 9.7 and 4.9 years, respectively.

On June 5, 2015, in connection with the Executive Employment Agreements, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable for a period of ten years with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date of $17.31 per share, with 400,000 of such options vesting in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date (“Time Vesting Options”), and 400,000 of such options vesting if the Company’s common stock trades at or above $25.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days while the executive is employed (“Price Vesting Options”), or on or before June 30, 2019, subject to certain conditions.   

Information regarding the Company’s stock option plans is summarized below:
               
       
Weighted
    
Aggregate
       
Average
    
Intrinsic
 
Shares
    
Exercise
    
Value
 
Under Options
    
Price
    
$(000’s)
Outstanding at January 1, 2015
 10,000
  
$
 33.36
    
 -
Granted
 800,000
    
 17.31
      
Lapsed or Cancelled
 (5,000)
    
 45.47
      
Outstanding at September 30, 2015 ($17.31 – $21.25)
 805,000
  
$
 17.33
  
$
 1,244
Options exercisable at September 30, 2015
 -
            
Available for grant at September 30, 2015
 3,416,456
            
               

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $3.06 per option. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model for Time Vesting Options and the Monte Carlo method for Price Vesting Options.  The following weighted average assumptions are included in the Company’s fair value calculations of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

           
   
Time Vesting
  
Price Vesting
  
   
Options
  
Options
  
Expected life (in years)
  
6.0
  
5.8
  
Risk-free interest rate
  
2.04
%
1.96
%
Volatility
  
29.0
%
29.0
%
Dividend yield
  
3.5
%
3.5
%

There were no stock options exercised under all stock option plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The Company has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.

The Company recognized stock options expense of $185,000 and $1,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $248,000 and $3,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
The Company has issued stock awards (“Restricted Stock Awards”) to officers, certain other employees, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company, which allow the holders to each receive a certain amount of shares of the Company’s common stock generally over a one to seven-year vesting period, of which 99,006 unvested shares were legally outstanding at September 30, 2015.  Of the Restricted Stock Awards issued to executive officers and certain other employees, 210,000 were contingent upon the Company meeting certain performance goals to be set by the Committee each year (“Performance Shares”), with the remaining based on time and service.
 
 
 
30
 
 

 
On September 12, 2012, the Company granted Restricted Stock Awards totaling 319,667 shares for those executive officers in place on such date.  The Restricted Stock Awards were to vest commencing January 1, 2014 and with the number of Restricted Stock Awards scheduled to be vested and earned on each vesting date on an annual basis over a five to seven year vesting schedule, with each annual vesting of each tranche of Restricted Stock Awards being subject to the attainment of annual performance targets to be set by the Committee for each year.  In connection with the departure of two executive officers effective March 31, 2014, the Company agreed to grant and accelerate vesting of 109,667 shares of Restricted Stock Awards on April 1, 2014.  In connection with the departure of the Company’s former president and chief executive officer effective June 30, 2015, the Company agreed to vest 84,000 Performance Shares and to grant and accelerate the vesting of 126,000 Performance Shares on the Separation Date.  See Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies – Departure of Executive Officer.

On June 5, 2015, in connection with the Executive Employment Agreements, the Company granted a total of 37,550.54 Restricted Stock Awards, which were valued in accordance with ASC 718 – Stock Compensation, at their fair value.  These awards are scheduled to vest equally over a three-year period on each annual anniversary date of the grant date.

All currently outstanding and unvested Restricted Stock Awards provided to the officers, certain other employees, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company were issued under the 2013 Plan.

Information regarding the Restricted Stock Awards grant activity is summarized below:

         
         
       
Weighted-Average
       
Grant – Date
 
Shares
    
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2015
 346,946
  
$
 21.09
Granted
 41,337
    
 17.51
Vested
 (249,795)
    
 21.44
Forfeited
 (1,931)
    
 20.31
Outstanding at September 30, 2015
 136,557
  
$
 19.37
 
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had $2.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Restricted Stock Awards granted under the Company’s stock compensation plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS/TSR-BASED AWARDS
On September 12, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the recommendations and ratified the determinations of the Committee with respect to new multi-year TSR based awards (the “TSR-Based Awards”) totaling 5,160 performance shares (the “TSR Performance Shares”) for those executive officers in place on such date, each TSR Performance Share evidencing the right to receive $1,000 in the Company’s common stock upon vesting.  In accordance with the amended and restated TSR-Based Awards agreements entered into between the Company and those executive officers in June 2013, the TSR Performance Shares were to vest commencing December 31, 2014, with the number of TSR Performance Shares scheduled to be granted annually over the next four years.  The Company granted 1,032 TSR Performance Shares in the year ended December 31, 2013, which were valued in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, at their fair value, utilizing a Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate the probability of the vesting conditions being satisfied.  In connection with the departure of two executive officers effective March 31, 2014, the Company agreed to vest 357 TSR Performance Shares and to grant and accelerate the vesting of 528 TSR Performance Shares, for which the Company issued 45,062 shares of Common Stock on April 2, 2014.  In connection with the departure of the Company’s former president and chief executive officer effective June 30, 2015, the Company agreed to vest 675 TSR Performance Shares on the Separation Date, for which it issued 41,811 shares of common stock.  See Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies – Departure of Executive Officer.

On June 5, 2015, in connection with the Executive Employment Agreements, the Company granted a total of 112,651.64 performance share units (“PSUs”) which will vest from 0 to 150 percent of the number of PSUs granted based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a peer group of equity office REITs over a three-year performance period starting from the grant date, each PSU evidencing the right to receive a share of the Company’s common stock upon vesting.  The PSUs are also entitled to the payment of dividend equivalents in respect of vested PSUs in the form of additional PSUs.  The PSUs were valued in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, at their fair value on the grant date, utilizing a Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate the probability of the vesting conditions being satisfied.
 
 
 
31
 

 
The Company has reserved shares of common stock under the 2004 Plan and 2013 Plan for issuance upon vesting of the TSR Performance Shares and PSUs in accordance with the terms and conditions of the TSR-Based Awards and PSUs.

DEFERRED STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
The Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, which commenced January 1, 1999, allows non-employee directors of the Company to elect to defer up to 100 percent of their annual retainer fee into deferred stock units.  The deferred stock units are convertible into an equal number of shares of common stock upon the directors’ termination of service from the Board of Directors or a change in control of the Company, as defined in the plan.  Deferred stock units are credited to each director quarterly using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the applicable dividend record date for the respective quarter.  Each participating director’s account is also credited for an equivalent amount of deferred stock units based on the dividend rate for each quarter.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, 15,279 and 15,230 deferred stock units were earned, respectively.  As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were 173,025 and 157,730 deferred stock units outstanding, respectively.

EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

The following information presents the Company’s results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share: (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
                       
   
            Three Months Ended
    
           Nine Months Ended
   
            September 30,
    
           September 30,
Computation of Basic EPS
  
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Net income (loss)
$
 (142,141)
  
$
 2,085 
  
$
 (106,077)
  
$
 41,804 
Add: Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
  
 (281)
    
 145 
    
 582 
    
 757 
Add:  Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
  
 15,530 
    
 (248)
    
 11,461 
    
 (4,754)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (126,892)
  
$
 1,982 
  
$
 (94,034)
  
$
 37,807 
                       
Weighted average common shares
  
 89,249 
    
 88,875 
    
 89,229 
    
 88,621 
                       
Basic EPS:
                      
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (1.42)
  
$
 0.02 
  
$
 (1.05)
  
$
 0.43 
                       

                       
   
            Three Months Ended
    
           Nine Months Ended
   
            September 30,
    
            September 30,
Computation of Diluted EPS
  
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (126,892)
  
$
 1,982 
  
$
 (94,034)
  
$
 37,807 
Add (deduct): Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
  
 (15,530)
    
 248 
    
 (11,461)
    
 4,754 
Net income (loss) for diluted earnings per share
$
 (142,422)
  
$
 2,230 
  
$
 (105,495)
  
$
 42,561 
                       
Weighted average common shares
  
 100,172 
    
 100,052 
    
 100,236 
    
 100,014 
                       
Diluted EPS:
                      
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (1.42)
  
$
 0.02 
  
$
 (1.05)
  
$
 0.43 
                       

The following schedule reconciles the shares used in the basic EPS calculation to the shares used in the diluted EPS calculation: (in thousands)
           
 
               Three Months Ended
  
                Nine Months Ended
 
                  September 30,
  
                 September 30,
 
2015
2014
  
2015
2014
Basic EPS shares
 89,249
 88,875
  
 89,229
 88,621
Add:   Operating Partnership – common units
 10,923
 11,120
  
 11,007
 11,334
          Restricted Stock Awards
 -
 57
  
 -
 59
Diluted EPS Shares
 100,172
 100,052
  
 100,236
 100,014
 
 
 
 
32
 
 
 
Contingently issuable shares under the PSU awards and Price Vesting Options were excluded from the denominator in 2015 because the criteria had not been met for the period ended September 30, 2015.  Contingently issuable shares under the TSR Performance Shares were excluded from the denominator in 2014 because the criteria had not been met for the period ended September 30, 2014.  Not included in the computations of diluted EPS were 405,000 and 10,000 stock options as such securities were anti-dilutive during the periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  Unvested restricted stock outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 were 99,006 and 304,816 shares, respectively.

Dividends declared per common share for each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.15 per share.  Dividends declared per common share for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.45 and $0.60 per share, respectively. 

 
15.   NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated financial statements relate to (i) common units in the Operating Partnership, held by parties other than the Company, and (ii) interests in consolidated joint ventures for the portion of such ventures not owned by the Company.

OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

Common Units
Certain individuals and entities own common units in the Operating Partnership.  A common unit and a share of Common Stock of the Company have substantially the same economic characteristics in as much as they effectively share equally in the net income or loss of the Operating Partnership.  Common unitholders have the right to redeem their common units, subject to certain restrictions.  The redemption is required to be satisfied in shares of Common Stock, cash, or a combination thereof, calculated as follows:  one share of the Company’s Common Stock, or cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of redemption, for each common unit.  The Company, in its sole discretion, determines the form of redemption of common units (i.e., whether a common unitholder receives Common Stock, cash, or any combination thereof).  If the Company elects to satisfy the redemption with shares of Common Stock as opposed to cash, it is obligated to issue shares of its Common Stock to the redeeming unitholder.  Regardless of the rights described above, the common unitholders may not put their units for cash to the Company or the Operating Partnership under any circumstances.  When a unitholder redeems a common unit, noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership is reduced and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Stockholders’ equity is increased.

Unit Transactions
The following table sets forth the changes in noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries which relate to the common units in the Operating Partnership for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

   
   
 
Common
 
Units
Balance at January 1, 2015
 11,083,876
  Redemption of common units for shares of common stock
 (293,734)
   
Balance at September 30, 2015
 10,790,142
 
The following table reflects the activity of noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively (dollars in thousands):

           
   
                                Nine Months Ended
     
           September 30,
 
  
2015
    
2014
Balance at January 1
$
 257,230 
  
$
 276,096 
Net income (loss)
  
 (12,043)
    
 3,997 
Common unit distributions
  
 (4,927)
    
 (6,793)
Increase in noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures
  
 251 
    
 487 
Redemption of common units
          
  for common stock
  
 (5,370)
    
 (14,211)
Rebalancing of ownership percentage
          
  between parent and subsidiaries
  
 276 
    
 257 
Balance at September 30
$
 235,417 
  
$
 259,833 
 
 
 
33
 
 
 
Pursuant to ASC 810, Consolidation, on the accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary, changes in a parent’s ownership interest (and transactions with noncontrolling interest unitholders in the subsidiary) while the parent retains its controlling interest in its subsidiary should be accounted for as equity transactions.  The carrying value of the noncontrolling interest shall be adjusted to reflect the change in its ownership interest in the subsidiary, with the offset to equity attributable to the parent.  Accordingly, as a result of equity transactions which caused changes in ownership percentages between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company has increased noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership and decreased additional paid-in capital in Mack-Cali Realty Corporation stockholders’ equity by approximately $0.3 million as of September 30, 2015.

Noncontrolling Interest Ownership
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the noncontrolling interest common unitholders owned 10.8 percent and 11.1 percent of the Operating Partnership, respectively.

CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The Company consolidates certain joint ventures in which it has ownership interests.  Various entities and/or individuals hold noncontrolling interests in these ventures.

PARTICIPATION RIGHTS
The Company’s interests in certain real estate projects (three properties and a future development) each provide for the initial distributions of net cash flow solely to the Company, and thereafter, other parties have participation rights in 50 percent of the excess net cash flow remaining after the distribution to the Company of the aggregate amount equal to the sum of: (a) the Company’s capital contributions, plus (b) an IRR of 10 percent per annum. 

 
16.   SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company operates in three business segments: (i) commercial and other real estate, (ii) multi-family real estate, and (iii) multi-family services.  The Company provides leasing, property management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its commercial and other real estate and multi-family real estate portfolio.  The Company’s multi-family services business also provides similar services for third parties.  The Company no longer considers construction services as a reportable segment as it phased out this line of business in 2014.  The Company had no revenues from foreign countries recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.  The Company had no long lived assets in foreign locations as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.  The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies, excluding depreciation and amortization.

The Company evaluates performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties in each of its real estate segments (commercial and other, and multi-family) and from its multi-family services segment.


 
34
 

Selected results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and selected asset information as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 regarding the Company’s operating segments are as follows.  Amounts for prior periods have been restated to conform to the current period segment reporting presentation: (dollars in thousands)


                               
   
Real Estate
                    
   
Commercial
          
Multi-family
      
Corporate
    
Total
   
& Other
    
Multi-family
    
Services
      
 & Other (d)
    
Company
Total revenues:
                              
Three months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 131,910 
  
$
 6,964 
  
$
 8,409 
(e)
  
$
 (1,125)
  
$
 146,158 
September 30, 2014
  
 141,659 
    
 6,711 
    
 8,300 
(f)
    
 (1,181)
    
 155,489 
Nine months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
  
 406,128 
    
 20,541 
    
 24,910 
(g)
    
 (3,139)
    
 448,440 
September 30, 2014
  
 446,036 
    
 19,801 
    
 22,650 
(h)
    
 (3,102)
    
 485,385 
                               
Total operating and
                              
   interest expenses (a):
                              
Three months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 59,810 
  
$
 4,233 
  
$
 9,598 
    
$
 28,236 
  
$
 101,877 
September 30, 2014
  
 68,537 
    
 3,529 
    
 10,249 
      
 28,102 
    
 110,417 
Nine months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
  
 199,178 
    
 12,775 
    
 28,304 
      
 79,804 
    
 320,061 
September 30, 2014
  
 228,571 
    
 10,276 
    
 28,790 
      
 97,053 
    
 364,690 
                               
Equity in earnings (loss) of
                              
   unconsolidated joint ventures:
                              
Three months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 5,181 
  
$
 (2,793)
  
$
 747 
    
$
 -
  
$
 3,135 
September 30, 2014
  
 328 
    
 (2,088)
    
 492 
      
 -
    
 (1,268)
Nine months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
  
 4,611 
    
 (8,290)
    
 956 
      
 -
    
 (2,723)
September 30, 2014
  
 3,145 
    
 (6,566)
    
 1,361 
      
 -
    
 (2,060)
                               
Net operating income (loss) (b):
                              
Three months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 77,281 
  
$
 (62)
  
$
 (442)
    
$
 (29,361)
  
$
 47,416 
September 30, 2014
  
 73,450 
    
 1,094 
    
 (1,457)
      
 (29,283)
    
 43,804 
Nine months ended:
                              
September 30, 2015
  
 211,561 
    
 (524)
    
 (2,438)
      
 (82,943)
    
 125,656 
September 30, 2014
  
 220,610 
    
 2,959 
    
 (4,779)
      
 (100,155)
    
 118,635 
                               
Total assets:
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 3,197,838 
  
$
 747,039 
  
$
 9,850 
    
$
 47,175 
  
$
 4,001,902 
December 31, 2014
  
 3,473,176 
    
 662,208 
    
 11,158 
      
 45,705 
    
 4,192,247 
                               
Total long-lived assets (c):
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 2,914,461 
  
$
 508,212 
  
$
 3,717 
    
$
 (1,865)
  
$
 3,424,525 
December 31, 2014
  
 3,181,225 
    
 486,243 
    
 3,858 
      
 (622)
    
 3,670,704 
                               
Total investments in
                              
   unconsolidated joint ventures:
                              
September 30, 2015
$
 76,715 
  
$
 221,717 
  
$
 1,054 
    
$
 -
  
$
 299,486 
December 31, 2014
  
 81,649 
    
 164,912 
    
 907 
      
 -
    
 247,468 
                               

(a)
Total operating and interest expenses represent the sum of: real estate taxes; utilities; operating services; direct construction costs; real estate services expenses; general and administrative and interest expense (net of interest income).  All interest expense, net of interest and other investment income, (including for property-level mortgages) is excluded from segment amounts and classified in Corporate & Other for all periods.
(b)
Net operating income represents total revenues less total operating and interest expenses (as defined in Note “a”), plus equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures, for the period.
(c)
Long-lived assets are comprised of net investment in rental property, unbilled rents receivable and goodwill.  The Company recorded an impairment charge of $164.2 million on assets included in the commercial and other real estate business segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – Impairments on Properties Held and Used.
(d)
Corporate & Other represents all corporate-level items (including interest and other investment income, interest expense, non-property general and administrative expense, construction services revenue and direct construction costs) as well as intercompany eliminations necessary to reconcile to consolidated Company totals.
(e)
Includes $1,621 of fees earned for this period from the multi-family real estate segment, which are eliminated in consolidation.
(f)
Includes $1,199 of fees earned for this period from the multi-family real estate segment, which are eliminated in consolidation.
(g)
Includes $4,452 of fees earned for this period from the multi-family real estate segment, which are eliminated in consolidation.
(h)
Includes $2,962 of fees earned for this period from the multi-family real estate segment, which are eliminated in consolidation.
 
 
 
35
 
 
 
The following schedule reconciles net operating income to net income available to common shareholders: (dollars in thousands)

                       
                   
   
          Three Months Ended
    
          Nine Months Ended
   
           September 30,
    
          September 30,
   
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Net operating income
$
 47,416
  
$
 43,804
  
$
 125,656
  
$
 118,635
Add (deduct):
                      
Depreciation and amortization
  
 (44,099)
    
 (41,983)
    
 (127,266)
    
 (131,679)
Realized gains on disposition of
                      
   rental property, net
  
 18,718
    
 264
    
 53,261
    
 54,848
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
  
 -
    
 -
    
 6,448
    
 -
Impairments
  
 (164,176)
    
 -
    
 (164,176)
    
 -
Net income (loss)
  
 (142,141)
    
 2,085
    
 (106,077)
    
 41,804
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
  
 (281)
    
 145
    
 582
    
 757
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
  
 15,530
    
 (248)
    
 11,461
    
 (4,754)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (126,892)
  
$
 1,982
  
$
 (94,034)
  
$
 37,807
 


















 
36
 





ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and the notes thereto (collectively, the “Financial Statements”).  Certain defined terms used herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Financial Statements.


Executive Overview

Mack-Cali Realty Corporation together with its subsidiaries, (the “Company”) has been involved in all aspects of commercial real estate development, management and ownership for over 60 years and has been a publicly-traded real estate investment trust (REIT) since 1994.  As of September 30, 2015, the Company owns or has interests in 274 properties (collectively, the “Properties”), consisting of 146 office and 109 flex properties, primarily class A office and office/flex buildings, totaling approximately 29.7 million square feet, leased to approximately 1,900 commercial tenants and 19 multi-family rental properties containing 5,644 residential units.  The Properties are located primarily in the Northeast, some with adjacent, Company-controlled developable land sites able to accommodate up to 5.3 million square feet of additional commercial space and 10,901 apartment units. 

The Company’s historical strategy has been to focus its operations, acquisition and development of office properties in high-barrier-to entry markets and sub-markets where it believes it is, or can become, a significant and preferred owner and operator. With changing work force demographics and reduced demand for suburban office properties in its current markets, the Company intends to continue to leverage its experience and expertise in its core Northeast markets to pursue a strategy of rebalancing its portfolio to only include assets it believes will offer attractive risk adjusted returns.  This strategy includes selectively disposing of non-core properties and redeploying the proceeds into other office assets and into the development of multi-family rental properties, as well as the repositioning of a portion of its office properties and land held for development to multi-family rental properties. 

In September 2015, the Company announced a three-year strategic initiative to transform into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties. In furtherance of this strategy, the Company has commenced a comprehensive review of its portfolio and operations and is developing a business strategy that focuses on reshaping its portfolio over time.  As part of this plan, the Company anticipates that it may dispose of a significant portion of its properties that do not meet its long-term goals, and, in September 2015, compiled a list of its properties that it considers as non-core to its ongoing operations.  Specifically, the Company considers a non-core property to have one or more of the following attributes:  (1) assets that do not offer an opportunity to create a competive advantage; (2) assets that produce a low cash yield; (3) assets which have physical attributes that constrain their market competitiveness; and (4) assets located in low growth markets.  The potential sales of these non-core properties over time would result in total estimated sales proceeds ranging from approximately $600 million to $800 million. 

As a result of this disposition strategy, at September 30, 2015, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying values of non-core properties and determined that due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of 22 rental properties to their estimated fair values and recorded an impairment charge on these properties of $158.6 million at September 30, 2015.

As an owner of real estate, almost all of the Company’s earnings and cash flow is derived from rental revenue received pursuant to leased space at the Properties.  Key factors that affect the Company’s business and financial results include the following: 

   
· 
the general economic climate;
· 
the occupancy rates of the Properties;
· 
rental rates on new or renewed leases;
· 
tenant improvement and leasing costs incurred to obtain and retain tenants;
· 
the extent of early lease terminations;
· 
the value of our office properties and the cash flow from the sale of such properties;
· 
operating expenses;
· 
anticipated acquisition and development costs for  office and multi-family rental properties and the revenues and earnings from these properties;
· 
cost of capital; and
· 
the extent of acquisitions, development and sales of real estate, including the execution of the Company’s current strategic initiative.
 
 
 
37
 
 
 
Any negative effects of the above key factors could potentially cause a deterioration in the Company’s revenue and/or earnings.  Such negative effects could include: (1) failure to renew or execute new leases as current leases expire; (2) failure to renew or execute new leases with rental terms at or above the terms of in-place leases; and (3) tenant defaults. 
 
A failure to renew or execute new leases as current leases expire or to execute new leases with rental terms at or above the terms of in-place leases may be affected by several factors such as: (1) the local economic climate, which may be adversely impacted by business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors; and (2) local real estate conditions, such as oversupply of the Company’s product types or competition within the market. 
 
Of the Company’s 10 core office markets, several continue to be weak while others have stabilized.  The percentage leased in the Company’s consolidated portfolio of stabilized operating commercial properties aggregating 24 million, 25 million and 25 million square feet at September 30, 2015, June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, was 85.8 percent leased at September 30, 2015 as compared to 82.3 percent leased at June 30, 2015 and 83.7 percent leased at September 30, 2014.  Percentage leased includes all leases in effect as of the period end date, some of which have commencement dates in the future and leases that expire at the period end date.  Leases that expired as of September 30, 2015, June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 aggregate 64,226, 74,128 and 160,152 square feet, respectively, or 0.3, 0.3 and 0.6 percentage of the net rentable square footage, respectively.  Rental rates (including escalations) on the Company’s commercial space that was renewed (based on first rents payable) during the three months ended September 30, 2015 (on 481,316 square feet of renewals) increased an average of 3.7 percent compared to rates that were in effect under the prior leases, as compared to a 4.8 percent decrease during the three months ended September 30, 2014 (on 268,576 square feet of renewals).  Estimated lease costs for the renewed leases during the three months ended September 30, 2015 averaged $3.19 per square foot per year for a weighted average lease term of 3.4 years and estimated lease costs for the renewed leases during the three months ended September 30, 2014 averaged $2.45 per square foot per year for a weighted average lease term of 3.4 years.  Although the Company has achieved positive leasing results in its core markets recently, it believes that commercial vacancy rates may continue to increase and commercial rental rates may continue to decline in some of its markets in 2015 and possibly beyond.  As of September 30, 2015, commercial leases which comprise approximately 8.0 percent of the Company’s annualized base rent are scheduled to expire during the year ended December 31, 2016.  Despite recent positive leasing activity, with the decline of rental rates in the Company’s office markets generally over the past few years, as leases expire in 2015 and 2016, assuming no significant improvements in current market rental rates, the Company expects in many cases that the rental rates it is likely to achieve on new leases may be lower than the rates currently being paid, thereby resulting in less revenue from the same space.  As a result of the above factors, the Company’s future earnings and cash flow may be negatively impacted by current market conditions affecting its commercial portfolio. 

As part of its strategic initiative described above, the Company may dispose of properties it considers non-core, and it may actively asset manage other low-growth real estate assets in a different way. The Company will selectively purchase assets in markets that it believes will offer above market returns.  The Company believes that the opportunity to invest in multi-family development properties at higher returns on cost will position the Company to potentially produce higher levels of net operating income than if the Company were to only purchase stabilized multi-family rental properties at market returns.  The Company anticipates that it will be several years before many of its multi-family development projects are income-producing.  Until the recent positive leasing activity prove to be sustaining, the long-term nature of the Company’s multi-family residential strategy coupled with the potential for continued weakness in some of the Company’s office markets, and the disposition of income producing non-core office properties to fund the Company’s planned office rental property acquisitions and multi-family residential development projects will likely result in static net operating income and cash flows relative to recent returns.

Primarily as a result of the factors described above, the Company believes that there is a potential for one or more of the three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to lower their current investment grade ratings on the Company’s senior unsecured debt to sub-investment grade in the near term.  Amongst other things, any such downgrade by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s will increase the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the Company’s $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility from LIBOR plus 130 basis points to LIBOR plus 170 basis points and the annual credit facility fee it pays will increase from 30 to 35 basis points.  In addition, a downgrade in its ratings to sub-investment grade would result in higher interest rates on senior unsecured debt that the Company may issue in the future as compared to issuing such debt with investment grade ratings.


 
38
 

The remaining portion of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should help the reader understand our: 

·  
recent transactions;
·  
critical accounting policies and estimates;
·  
results from operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and
·  
liquidity and capital resources.


Recent Transactions

Acquisitions
On October 23, 2015, the Company signed an agreement to acquire a 196,000 square-foot office property located in Edison, New Jersey, for approximately $53.1 million, subject to certain conditions.  The acquisition is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2015.

On April 1, 2015, the Company acquired vacant land to accommodate a two-phase development of the CitySquare Project for a purchase price of $3.1 million with an additional $1.25 million to be paid (which is accrued as of September 30, 2015), subject to certain conditions, in accordance with the terms of the purchase and sale agreement.  The purchase price for the acquisition was funded primarily through borrowing under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.  The first phase with 237 units started construction in the third quarter 2015 with anticipated initial deliveries in the second quarter 2017.  The second phase, with 128 units, is projected to begin construction in 2017.  Total development costs are estimated to be approximately $92.5 million (of which $7.1 million was incurred by the Company through September 30, 2015).  For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, included in general and administrative expense was approximately $111,000 in transaction costs related to this acquisition.   

Dispositions
On June 26, 2015, the Company sold its 203,506 square foot office property located at 14 Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey for net sales proceeds of approximately $80 million, with a gain of approximately $24.7 million from the sale.

On June 1, 2015, the Company sold its 25 percent equity interest in Rosewood Lafayette Holdings L.L.C., a joint venture which owns the Highlands at Morristown Station, a 217-unit multi-family property located in Morristown, New Jersey, to its joint venture partner with a gain on the sale of $6.4 million.

On January 15, 2015, the Company sold its 21,600 square foot office/flex property located at 1451 Metropolitan Drive in West Deptford, New Jersey for net sales proceeds of approximately $1.1 million, with a gain of approximately $0.1 million from the sale.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company transferred the deeds for two of its office properties to the lender in satisfaction of its mortgage loan obligations. The properties transferred consisted of 5 Becker Farm Road in Roseland, New Jersey, aggregating 118,343 square feet, which was collateral for a $14.4 million mortgage loan scheduled to mature on May 11, 2016, and 210 Clay Avenue in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, aggregating 121,203 square feet, which was collateral for a $13.8 million mortgage loan also scheduled to mature on May 11, 2016.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company transferred the deeds for two of its office properties to the lender in satisfaction of its mortgage loan obligations. The properties transferred consisted of 4 Sylvan Way in Parsippany, New Jersey, aggregating 105,135 square feet, which was collateral for a $14.6 million mortgage loan that matured on August 11, 2014, and 10 Independence Boulevard in Warren, New Jersey, aggregating 120,528 square feet, which was collateral for a $16.9 million mortgage loan that matured on August 11, 2014.  The Company had previously recorded impairment charges on these four properties totaling $25.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded gains on the disposal of these office properties for a total of $18.7 million and $28.4 million, respectively.
 
Impairments on Properties Held and Used
In September 2015, the Company announced a three-year strategic initiative to transform the Company into a more concentrated owner of New Jersey Hudson River waterfront and transit-oriented office properties and a regional owner of luxury multi-family residential properties. In connection with the transformation of the Company’s portfolio, management began developing a disposition plan in September 2015, which will be an ongoing assessment process.  Through this plan, the Company, in the coming years, expects to dispose of primarily office properties considered non-core to its ongoing operations.  As a result, at September 30, 2015, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the carrying values of these non-core properties, and determined that due to the shortening of the expected periods of ownership, it was necessary to reduce the carrying values of 22 rental properties to their estimated fair values.  Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $158.6 million at September 30, 2015 reducing the aggregate carrying values of these properties from $554.3 million to their estimated fair values of $395.7 million.
 
 
 
39
 
 

 
Four of the Company’s office properties are collateral for a mortgage loan that matured on August 11, 2014, with a principal balance of $65.0 million as of September 30, 2015. The loan was not repaid at maturity and the Company is in discussions with the lender regarding potential options in satisfaction of the obligation (see Note 9: Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations).   As of September 30, 2015, the Company estimated that the carrying value of three of  these properties, aggregating 479,877 square feet and located in Roseland and Parsippany, New Jersey, may not be recoverable over their anticipated holding periods. In order to reduce the carrying values of the properties to their estimated fair values, the Company recorded impairment charges of $5.6 million at September 30, 2015, which resulted from the current decline in leasing activity and market rents of the properties identified.   The Company had previously recorded impairment charges on these properties at September 30, 2013 of $12.5 million.

Unconsolidated Joint Venture Activity
RIVERPARK AT HARRISON I, L.L.C./RIVERPARK AT HARRISON
On July 14, 2015, Riverpark at Harrison I, L.L.C. (“Riverpark”), which owns a 141-unit multi-family rental property located in Harrison, New Jersey, refinanced the $23.4 million construction loan, and obtained a $30 million mortgage loan. The Company received a distribution of $1.7 million from the loan proceeds. Concurrent with the loan refinancing, the Company, which holds a 36 percent interest in Riverpark, and its venture partners that hold ownership interests aggregating 44 percent acquired the 20 percent interest of the remaining partner group for $2.1 million.  As a result of the 20 percent redemption, the Company’s ownership interest increased to 45 percent with the remaining venture partners owning 55 percent.  The Company has determined that the joint venture is not a VIE since the equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit Riverpark to finance its activities without additional financial support.  As control is shared with the partners in accordance with the operating agreement, the Company will continue to have an unconsolidated joint venture interest in Riverpark under the provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation.

KEYSTONE-PENN
On August 28, 2015, Rosetree KPG III, L.L.C., which owns a 236,417 square-foot two-building office property located in Media, Pennsylvania refinanced its $31.8 million loan and obtained a new $45.5 million mortgage loan. The Company received a distribution of $3.7 million as its share of the loan proceeds recognized as equity in earnings during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (as a result of having no carrying value of its investment in the unconsolidated joint venture).


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), and variable interest entities for which the Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary, if any.  See Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures – to the Financial Statements, for the Company’s treatment of unconsolidated joint venture interests.  Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation, provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIEs. Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either: (1) the equity investors (if any) lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity's activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.  The Company consolidates VIEs in which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary.  The primary beneficiary is defined by the entity having both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that, when taken together, most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s performance: and (2) the obligation to absorb losses and right to receive the returns from the VIE that would be significant to the VIE.

The Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  The preparation of the Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.  These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s historical experience that are believed to be reasonable at the time.  However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment.  The Company’s critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about matters that are highly uncertain.  Different estimates could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results.  Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances.
 
 
 
40
 
 

 
Rental Property:
Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Costs directly related to the acquisition, development and construction of rental properties are capitalized.  Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.  Capitalized development and construction costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development and construction costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, salaries and other project costs incurred during the period of development.  Interest capitalized by the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $11.7 million and $10.7 million, respectively.  Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.  Fully-depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.

The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the substantial completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities such as routine maintenance and cleanup).  If portions of a rental project are substantially completed and occupied by tenants, or held available for occupancy, and other portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions are accounted for as a separate project.  The Company allocates costs incurred between the portions under construction and the portions substantially completed and held available for occupancy, primarily based on a percentage of the relative square footage of each portion, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portion under construction.

Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The estimated useful lives are as follows:

   
Leasehold interests
Remaining lease term
Buildings and improvements
5 to 40 years
Tenant improvements
The shorter of the term of the
 
related lease or useful life
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
5 to 10 years

Upon acquisition of rental property, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The Company records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases.  The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases.

Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases.  In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
 
 
 
41
 
 

 
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s rental properties held for use may be impaired.  In addition to identifying any specific circumstances which may affect a property or properties, management considers other criteria for determining which properties may require assessment for potential impairment.  The criteria considered by management include reviewing low leased percentages, significant near-term lease expirations, recently acquired properties, current and historical operating and/or cash flow losses, near-term mortgage debt maturities or other factors that might impact the Company’s intent and ability to hold the property.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Company’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions.  These assumptions are generally based on management’s experience in its local real estate markets and the effects of current market conditions.  The assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved, and actual losses or impairments may be realized in the future.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – Impairments on Properties Held and Used – to the Financial Statements.

Rental Property Held for Sale:
When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets.  If, in management’s opinion, the estimated net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established.

If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used.  A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying value before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting.  The Company applies the equity method by initially recording these investments at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions.  The outside basis portion of the Company’s joint ventures is amortized over the anticipated useful lives of the underlying ventures’ tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Generally, the Company would discontinue applying the equity method when the investment (and any advances) is reduced to zero and would not provide for additional losses unless the Company has guaranteed obligations of the venture or is otherwise committed to providing further financial support for the investee.    If the venture subsequently generates income, the Company only recognizes its share of such income to the extent it exceeds its share of previously unrecognized losses.

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired.  An investment is impaired only if management’s estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the value of the investment.  The Company’s estimates of value for each investment (particularly in real estate joint ventures) are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and operating costs.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the values estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be realized, and actual losses or impairment may be realized in the future.  See Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures – to the Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition:
Base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.  Unbilled rents receivable represents the cumulative amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with the lease agreements.

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases.  The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.
 
 
 
42
 

 
Escalations and recoveries from tenants are received from tenants for certain costs as provided in the lease agreements.  These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance and other recoverable costs.

Real estate services revenue includes property management, development, construction and leasing commission fees and other services, and payroll and related costs reimbursed from clients.  Fee income derived from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures (which are capitalized by such ventures) are recognized to the extent attributable to the unaffiliated ownership interests.

Parking income includes income from parking spaces leased to tenants and others.

Other income includes income from tenants for additional services arranged for by the Company and income from tenants for early lease terminations.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Management performs a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if an allowance for doubtful accounts is required based on factors affecting the collectability of the accounts receivable balances. The factors considered by management in determining which individual tenant receivable balances, or aggregate receivable balances, require a collectability allowance include the age of the receivable, the tenant’s payment history, the nature of the charges, any communications regarding the charges and other related information. Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to exercise significant judgment about the timing, frequency and severity of collection losses, which affects the allowance and net income.

Discontinued Operations:
In April 2014, the FASB issued guidance related to the reporting of discontinued operation and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity.  This guidance defines a discontinued operation as a component or group of components disposed or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and final result; the guidance states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of a major geographical area of operations, a major line of business, a major equity method investment or other major parts of an entity.  The guidance also provides for additional disclosure requirements in connection with both discontinued operations and other dispositions not qualifying as discontinued operations.  The guidance is effective for all companies for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. The guidance applies prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale after the effective date.  All entities could early adopt the guidance for new disposals (or new classifications as held for sale) that had not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company elected to early adopt this standard effective with the interim period beginning January 1, 2014.  Prior to January 1, 2014, properties identified as held for sale and/or disposed of were presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.


Results From Operations

The following comparisons for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (“2015”), as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 (“2014”), make reference to the following:  (i) the effect of the “Same-Store Properties,” which represent all in-service properties owned by the Company at June 30, 2014, (for the three-month period comparisons), and which represent all in-service properties owned by the Company at December 31, 2013 (for the nine-month period comparisons), excluding properties that were sold, disposed of, removed from service, or being redeveloped or repositioned from January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015; (ii) the effect of the “Acquired Properties,” which represent all properties acquired by the Company or commencing initial operations from July 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 (for the three-month comparisons), and which represent all properties acquired by the Company or commencing initial operation from January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 (for the nine-month period comparisons) and (iii) the effect of “Properties Sold,” which represent properties sold, disposed of, or removed from service (including properties being redeveloped or repositioned) by the Company from January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015.  During the 2015 and 2014 periods, four office properties, aggregating 657,523 square feet, were removed from service as they were being redeveloped by the Company. 



 
43
 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
                       
   
Three Months Ended
            
     
September 30,
    
Dollar
   Percent
    
(dollars in thousands)
  
2015
    
2014
    
Change
   Change
    
Revenue from rental operations and other:
                      
Base rents
$
 119,707 
  
$
 125,793 
  
$
 (6,086)
  
 (4.8)
%
Escalations and recoveries from tenants
  
 15,050 
    
 19,172 
    
 (4,122)
  
 (21.5)
  
Parking income
  
 2,749 
    
 2,255 
    
 494 
  
 21.9 
  
Other income
  
 1,142 
    
 647 
    
 495 
  
 76.5 
  
Total revenues from rental operations
  
 138,648 
    
 147,867 
    
 (9,219)
  
 (6.2)
  
                       
Property expenses:
                      
Real estate taxes
  
 19,143 
    
 22,154 
    
 (3,011)
  
 (13.6)
  
Utilities
  
 13,172 
    
 15,701 
    
 (2,529)
  
 (16.1)
  
Operating services
  
 24,535 
    
 26,519 
    
 (1,984)
  
 (7.5)
  
Total property expenses
  
 56,850 
    
 64,374 
    
 (7,524)
  
 (11.7)
  
                       
Non-property revenues:
                      
Real estate services
  
 7,510 
    
 7,622 
    
 (112)
  
 (1.5)
  
Total non-property revenues
  
 7,510 
    
 7,622 
    
 (112)
  
 (1.5)
  
                       
Non-property expenses:
                      
Real estate services expenses
  
 6,673 
    
 6,933 
    
 (260)
  
 (3.8)
  
General and administrative
  
 13,670 
    
 12,665 
    
 1,005 
  
 7.9 
  
Depreciation and amortization
  
 44,099 
    
 41,983 
    
 2,116 
  
 5.0 
  
Impairments
  
 164,176 
    
 -
    
 164,176 
  
 -
  
Total non-property expenses
  
 228,618 
    
 61,581 
    
 167,037 
  
 271.2 
  
Operating income (loss)
  
 (139,310)
    
 29,534 
    
 (168,844)
  
 (571.7)
  
Other (expense) income:
                      
Interest expense
  
 (24,689)
    
 (27,353)
    
 2,664 
  
 9.7 
  
Interest and other investment income
  
 5 
    
 908 
    
 (903)
  
 (99.4)
  
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
  
 3,135 
    
 (1,268)
    
 4,403 
  
 347.2 
  
Realized gains (losses) on disposition
                      
   of rental property, net
  
 18,718 
    
 264 
    
 18,454 
  
 6,990.2 
  
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
  
 -
    
 -
    
 -
  
 -
  
Total other (expense) income
  
 (2,831)
    
 (27,449)
    
 24,618 
  
 89.7 
  
Net income (loss)
  
 (142,141)
    
 2,085 
    
 (144,226)
  
 (6,917.3)
  
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
  
 (281)
    
 145 
    
 (426)
  
 (293.8)
  
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
  
 15,530 
    
 (248)
    
 15,778 
  
 6,362.1 
  
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (126,892)
  
$
 1,982 
  
$
 (128,874)
  
 (6,502.2)
%


 
44
 


The following is a summary of the changes in revenue from rental operations and property expenses in 2015 as compared to 2014 divided into Same-Store Properties, Acquired Properties and Properties Sold in 2014 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
                                               
   
    Total
      
      Same-Store
      
      Acquired
      
      Properties
  
   
    Company
      
      Properties
      
       Properties
      
Sold in 2014 and 2015
  
   
Dollar
   Percent
 
    
Dollar
   Percent
 
    
Dollar
   Percent
 
  
Dollar
   Percent
 
(dollars in thousands)
  
Change
   Change
 
    
Change
   Change
 
    
Change
   Change
 
  
Change
   Change
 
Revenue from rental
                                              
  operations and other:
                                              
Base rents
$
 (6,086)
  
 (4.8)
%
  
$
 1,401 
  
 1.1 
%
  
$
 -
  
 -
%
  
$
 (7,487)
  
 (5.9)
%
Escalations and recoveries
                              
 
              
  from tenants
  
 (4,122)
  
 (21.5)
      
 (2,939)
  
 (15.3)
      
 -
  
 -
      
 (1,183)
  
 (6.2)
  
Parking income
  
 494 
  
 21.9 
      
 303 
  
 13.4 
      
 189 
  
 8.4 
      
 2 
  
 0.1 
  
Other income
  
 495 
  
 76.5 
      
 493 
  
 76.2 
      
 -
  
 -
      
 2 
  
 0.3 
  
Total
$
 (9,219)
  
 (6.2)
%
  
$
 (742)
  
 (0.5)
%
  
$
 189 
  
 0.1 
%
  
$
 (8,666)
  
 (5.9)
%
                                               
Property expenses:
                                              
Real estate taxes
$
 (3,011)
  
 (13.6)
%
  
$
 (2,549)
  
 (11.5)
%
  
$
 314 
  
 1.4 
%
  
$
 (776)
  
 (3.5)
%
Utilities
  
 (2,529)
  
 (16.1)
      
 (1,917)
  
 (12.2)
      
 -
  
 -
      
 (612)
  
 (3.9)
  
Operating services
  
 (1,984)
  
 (7.5)
      
 (638)
  
 (2.4)
      
 162 
  
 0.6 
      
 (1,508)
  
 (5.7)
  
Total
$
 (7,524)
  
 (11.7)
%
  
$
 (5,104)
  
 (7.9)
%
  
$
 476 
  
 0.7 
%
  
$
 (2,896)
  
 (4.5)
%
                                               
OTHER DATA:
                                              
Number of Consolidated Properties
  
 222 
          
 222 
          
 -
          
 26 
      
Commercial Square feet (in thousands)
  
 24,016 
          
 24,016 
          
 -
          
 3,959 
      
Multi-family portfolio (number of units)
  
 1,301 
          
 1,301 
          
 -
          
 -
      

Base rents. Base rents for the Same-Store Properties increased $1.4 million, or 1.1 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to an increase in occupancy in 2015 as compared to 2014, which resulted from a 160 basis point increase in the average same store percent leased to 85.3 percent from 83.7 percent, partially offset by a $0.19 decrease in average annual rents per square foot to $22.18 from $22.37.

Escalations and recoveries. Escalations and recoveries from tenants for the Same-Store Properties decreased $2.9 million, or 15.3 percent, for 2015 over 2014 due primarily to recoveries from tenants of higher electric expenses in 2014 which the Company partially recovers from tenants pursuant to the terms of most of its leases with significantly lower expenses to recover in 2015.

Parking income. Parking income for the Same-Store Properties increased $0.3 million, or 13.4 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014 due primarily to increased usage.

Other income. Other income for the Same-Store Properties increased $0.5 million, or 76.2 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to various small income items in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Real estate taxes. Real estate taxes on the Same-Store Properties decreased $2.5 million, or 11.5 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  The change in real estate taxes principally results from an increase in tax appeal proceeds received in 2015 as compared to 2014.  Real estate taxes, without the effect of net tax appeal proceeds, increased $0.4 million, or 1.7 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014 due primarily to increased rates.

Utilities. Utilities for the Same-Store Properties decreased $1.9 million, or 12.2 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to decreased electricity rates in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Operating Services. Operating services for the Same-Store Properties decreased $0.6 million, or 2.4 percent, due primarily to a decrease in property maintenance costs in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Real estate services revenue. Real estate services revenue (primarily reimbursement of property personnel costs) decreased $0.1 million, or 1.5 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to decreased third party development and management activity in multi-family services in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Real estate services expense. Real estate services expense decreased $0.3 million, or 3.8 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to decreased compensation and related costs.
 
 
 
45
 
 

 
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million in 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to separation costs of $1.5 million related to terminated employees in 2015, partially offset by lower professional fees and marketing expenses for 2015 as compared to 2014.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $2.1 million, or 5.0 percent, for 2015 over 2014.  This increase was due primarily to accelerated depreciation in 2015 for properties being removed from service.

Impairments. The Company recorded impairments on assets held and used for 25 properties totaling $164.2 million in 2015.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – to the Financial Statements.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $2.7 million, or 9.7 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  This decrease was primarily the result of lower overall average debt balances in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Interest and other investment income. Interest and other investment income decreased $0.9 million, or 99.4 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  This was primarily due to interest income on lower average notes receivable balances in 2015.

Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $4.4 million, or 347.2 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  The increase was due primarily to income of $3.7 million in 2015 from distributions received from the Keystone-Penn joint venture due to a loan refinancing of the venture’s property.

Realized gains (losses) on disposition of rental property, net. The Company had realized gains on disposition of rental property of $18.7 million in 2015 and $0.3 million in 2014.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – to the Financial Statements.

Net income (loss). Net income decreased to a loss of $142.1 million in 2015 from income of $2.1 million in 2014.  The decrease of $144.2 million was due to the factors discussed above.

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Net income available to common shareholders decreased $128.9 million, or 6,502.2 percent, from income of $2.0 million in 2014 to a loss of $126.9 million in 2015.  The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net income of $144.2 million (primarily due to $164.2 million in impairments in 2015) for 2015 as compared to 2014 and a decrease in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures of $0.4 million for 2015 as compared to 2014.  These were partially offset by an increase in noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership of approximately $15.7 million for 2015 as compared to 2014.


 
46
 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
                       
   
              Nine Months Ended
            
   
              September 30,
    
Dollar
   Percent
 
(dollars in thousands)
  
2015
    
2014
    
Change
   Change
 
Revenue from rental operations and other:
                      
Base rents
$
 364,746 
  
$
 393,054 
  
$
 (28,308)
  
 (7.2)
%
Escalations and recoveries from tenants
  
 49,291 
    
 61,736 
    
 (12,445)
  
 (20.2)
  
Parking income
  
 8,141 
    
 6,605 
    
 1,536 
  
 23.3 
  
Other income
  
 3,707 
    
 2,667 
    
 1,040 
  
 39.0 
  
Total revenues from rental operations
  
 425,885 
    
 464,062 
    
 (38,177)
  
 (8.2)
  
                       
Property expenses:
                      
Real estate taxes
  
 63,005 
    
 69,880 
    
 (6,875)
  
 (9.8)
  
Utilities
  
 44,146 
    
 58,555 
    
 (14,409)
  
 (24.6)
  
Operating services
  
 78,607 
    
 83,581 
    
 (4,974)
  
 (6.0)
  
Total property expenses
  
 185,758 
    
 212,016 
    
 (26,258)
  
 (12.4)
  
                       
Non-property revenues:
                      
Real estate services
  
 22,555 
    
 21,323 
    
 1,232 
  
 5.8 
  
Total non-property revenues
  
 22,555 
    
 21,323 
    
 1,232 
  
 5.8 
  
                       
Non-property expenses:
                      
Real estate services expenses
  
 19,520 
    
 20,213 
    
 (693)
  
 (3.4)
  
General and administrative
  
 36,669 
    
 49,219 
    
 (12,550)
  
 (25.5)
  
Depreciation and amortization
  
 127,266 
    
 131,679 
    
 (4,413)
  
 (3.4)
  
Impairments
  
 164,176 
    
 -
    
 164,176 
  
 -
  
Total non-property expenses
  
 347,631 
    
 201,111 
    
 146,520 
  
 72.9 
  
Operating income (loss)
  
 (84,949)
    
 72,258 
    
 (157,207)
  
 (217.6)
  
Other (expense) income:
                      
Interest expense
  
 (78,677)
    
 (85,458)
    
 6,781 
  
 7.9 
  
Interest and other investment income
  
 563 
    
 2,216 
    
 (1,653)
  
 (74.6)
  
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
  
 (2,723)
    
 (2,060)
    
 (663)
  
 (32.2)
  
Realized gains (losses) on disposition
                      
   of rental property, net
  
 53,261 
    
 54,848 
    
 (1,587)
  
 (2.9)
  
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
  
 6,448 
    
 -
    
 6,448 
  
 -
  
Total other (expense) income
  
 (21,128)
    
 (30,454)
    
 9,326 
  
 30.6 
  
Net income (loss)
  
 (106,077)
    
 41,804 
    
 (147,881)
  
 (353.7)
  
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
  
 582 
    
 757 
    
 (175)
  
 (23.1)
  
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
  
 11,461 
    
 (4,754)
    
 16,215 
  
 341.1 
  
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (94,034)
  
$
 37,807 
  
$
 (131,841)
  
 (348.7)
%


 
47
 

The following is a summary of the changes in revenue from rental operations and property expenses in 2015 as compared to 2014 divided into Same-Store Properties, Acquired Properties and Properties Sold or removed from service in 2014 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
                                               
   
     Total
      
     Same-Store
      
      Acquired
      
      Properties
  
   
     Company
      
      Properties
      
      Properties
      
Sold in 2014 and 2015
  
   
Dollar
   Percent
 
    
Dollar
   Percent
 
    
Dollar
   Percent
 
    
Dollar
   Percent
 
(dollars in thousands)
  
Change
   Change      
Change
   Change
 
    
Change
   Change
 
    
Change
   Change
 
Revenue from rental
                                              
  operations and other:
                                              
Base rents
$
 (28,308)
  
(7.2)
%
  
$
 3,474 
  
0.9
%
  
$
 990 
  
0.3
%
  
$
 (32,772)
  
 (8.4)
%
Escalations and recoveries
                              
 
              
  from tenants
  
 (12,445)
  
(20.2)
      
 (5,844)
  
(9.5)
      
 37 
  
0.1
      
 (6,638)
  
 (10.8)
  
Parking income
  
 1,536 
  
23.3
      
 939 
  
14.3
      
 594 
  
9.0
      
 3 
  
 -
  
Other income
  
 1,040 
  
39.0
      
 651 
  
24.5
      
 60 
  
2.2
      
 329 
  
 12.3 
  
Total
$
 (38,177)
  
(8.2)
%
  
$
 (780)
  
(0.2)
%
  
$
 1,681 
  
0.4
%
  
$
 (39,078)
  
 (8.4)
%
                                               
Property expenses:
                                              
Real estate taxes
$
 (6,875)
  
(9.8)
%
  
$
 (4,119)
  
(5.9)
%
  
$
 1,660 
  
2.4
%
  
$
 (4,416)
  
 (6.3)
%
Utilities
  
 (14,409)
  
(24.6)
      
 (8,345)
  
(14.3)
      
 155 
  
0.3
      
 (6,219)
  
 (10.6)
  
Operating services
  
 (4,974)
  
(6.0)
      
 1,851 
  
2.2
      
 870 
  
1.0
      
 (7,695)
  
 (9.2)
  
Total
$
 (26,258)
  
(12.4)
%
  
$
 (10,613)
  
(5.0)
%
  
$
 2,685 
  
1.3
%
  
$
 (18,330)
  
 (8.7)
%
                                               
OTHER DATA:
                                              
Number of Consolidated Properties
  
 222 
          
 221 
          
 1 
          
 26 
      
Commercial Square feet (in thousands)
  
 24,016 
          
 24,016 
          
 -
          
 3,959 
      
Multi-family portfolio (number of units)
  
 1,301 
          
 1,081 
          
 220 
          
 -
      

Base rents. Base rents for the Same-Store Properties increased $3.5 million, or 0.9 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to an increase in occupancy in 2015 as compared to 2014, which resulted from a 30 basis point increase in the average same store percent leased to 84.4 percent from 84.1 percent and an increase in average annual rents per square foot to $22.23 from $22.21.

Escalations and recoveries. Escalations and recoveries from tenants for the Same-Store Properties decreased $5.8 million, or 9.5 percent, for 2015 over 2014 due primarily to recoveries from tenants of higher electric expenses in 2014 which the Company partially recovers from tenants pursuant to the terms of most of its leases with significantly lower expenses to recover in 2015.

Parking income. Parking income for the Same-Store Properties increased $0.9 million, or 14.3 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014 due primarily to increased usage.

Other income. Other income for the Same-Store Properties increased $0.7 million, or 24.5 percent, due primarily to an increase in lease breakage fees recognized in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Real estate taxes. Real estate taxes on the Same-Store Properties decreased $4.1 million, or 5.9 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  The change in real estate taxes principally results from an increase in tax appeal proceeds received in 2015 as compared to 2014.  Real estate taxes, without the effect of net tax appeal proceeds, increased $2.4 million, or 3.4 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to increased rates.

Utilities. Utilities for the Same-Store Properties decreased $8.3 million, or 14.3 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to decreased electricity rates in 2015 as compared to 2014.  Extended winter freeze conditions in early 2014 caused record electricity demand, and combined with reduced natural gas production and distribution disruptions, resulted in significant market price increases for electricity during the 2014 period.

Operating services. Operating services for the Same-Store Properties increased $1.9 million, or 2.2 percent, due primarily to an increase in snow removal and other maintenance and service costs of $1.8 million in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Real estate services revenue. Real estate services revenue (primarily reimbursement of property personnel costs) increased $1.2 million, or 5.8 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to increased third party development and management activity in multi-family services in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Real estate services expense. Real estate services expense decreased $0.7 million, or 3.4 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to decreased compensation and related costs.
 
 
 
48
 
 
 
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased $12.6 million or 25.5 percent, in 2015 as compared to 2014, due primarily to approximately $11 million in severance costs related to the departure of two of the Company’s executive officers in 2014, and acquisition transaction costs of $1.9 million incurred in 2014.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased $4.4 million, or 3.4 percent, for 2015 over 2014.  This decrease was due primarily to assets of the Same-Store Properties becoming fully amortized and depreciation in 2014 for properties sold in 2014 and early 2015.  These were partially offset by accelerated depreciation in 2015 for properties being removed from service.

Impairments. The Company recorded impairment charges on properties held and used for 25 properties totaling $164.2 million in 2015.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – to the Financial Statements.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $6.8 million, or 7.9 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  This decrease was primarily the result of lower overall average debt balances in 2015 as compared to 2014.

Interest and other investment income. Interest and other investment income decreased $1.7 million, or 74.6 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  This was primarily due to interest income on lower average notes receivable balances in 2015.

Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures. Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $0.7 million, or 32.2 percent, for 2015 as compared to 2014.  The decrease was due primarily to a gain of $2.4 million in 2014 from the Stamford SM venture (the venture’s note receivable was repaid in 2014), and a loss of $2.6 million in 2015 from the Capitol Place Mezz venture (which commenced operations in 2015).  These were partially offset by income of $3.7 million in 2015 from distributions received from the Keystone-Penn joint venture due to a loan refinancing of the venture’s property.

Realized gains (losses) on disposition of rental property, net. The Company had realized gains on disposition of rental property of $53.3 million in 2015 and $54.8 million in 2014.  See Note 3: Recent Transactions – to the Financial Statements.

Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture. The Company realized a gain of $6.4 million in 2015 on the sale of its equity interest in the Rosewood Lafayette Holdings L.L.C. joint venture.

Net income (loss). Net income decreased to a loss of $106.1 million in 2015 from income of $41.8 million in 2014.  The decrease of $147.9 million was due to the factors discussed above.

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Net income available to common shareholders decreased $131.8 million, or 348.7 percent, from income of $37.8 million in 2014 to a loss of $94.0 million in 2015.  The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net income of $147.9 million for 2015 (primarily due to $164.2 million in impairments in 2015) as compared to 2014 and a decrease in noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures of $0.2 million for 2015 as compared to 2014.  These were partially offset by an increase in noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership of approximately $16.3 million for 2015 as compared to 2014.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Overview:
Historically, rental revenue has been the Company’s principal source of funds to pay operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and dividends, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures.  To the extent that the Company’s cash flow from operating activities is insufficient to finance its non-recurring capital expenditures such as property acquisitions, development and construction costs and other capital expenditures, the Company has and expects to continue to finance such activities through borrowings under its revolving credit facility, other debt and equity financings, proceeds from the sale of properties and joint venture capital.

The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements generally through its working capital, which may include proceeds from the sales of office properties, net cash provided by operating activities and from its revolving credit facility.  The Company frequently examines potential property acquisitions and development projects and, at any given time, one or more of such acquisitions or development projects may be under consideration.  Accordingly, the ability to fund property acquisitions and development projects is a major part of the Company’s financing requirements.  The Company expects to meet its financing requirements through funds generated from operating activities, to the extent available, proceeds from property sales, joint venture capital, long-term and short-term borrowings (including draws on the Company’s revolving credit facility) and the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities.
 
 
 
49
 
 

 
Repositioning of the Company’s Portfolio:
As described earlier relative to its current strategic initiative, the Company’s management has been reviewing its portfolio and identifying opportunities to divest of non-core office properties that no longer meet its long-term strategy, have reached their potential, are less efficient to operate, or when market conditions are favorable to be sold at attractive prices.  The Company anticipates redeploying the proceeds from non-core rental property sales in the near-term to acquire office properties, develop, redevelop and acquire multi-family rental properties, as well as reposition certain office properties into multi-family residential and/or mixed use properties, in its core Northeast sub-markets.

Construction Projects:
On May 21, 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Ironstate Harborside-A LLC (“ISA”) to form Harborside Unit A Urban Renewal, L.L.C. (“URL-Harborside”), a newly-formed joint venture that will develop, own and operate a high-rise tower of approximately 763 multi-family apartment units above a parking pedestal to be located on land contributed by the Company at its Harborside complex in Jersey City, New Jersey (the “URL Project”).  The Company owns an 85 percent interest in URL-Harborside and the remaining interest is owned by ISA, with shared control over major decisions such as approval of budgets, property financings and leasing guidelines.  The construction of the URL Project is estimated to cost a total of approximately $320 million (of which development costs of $174.4 million have been incurred by URL-Harborside through September 30, 2015).  The URL Project is projected to be ready for occupancy by the fourth quarter of 2016.  The venture has a construction/permanent loan with a maximum borrowing amount of $192 million (with $22.9 million outstanding as of September 30, 2015), which bears interest at a rate of 5.197 percent and matures in August 2029.  The Company does not expect to fund any future development costs of the project, as future development costs will be funded by using the loan financing.

In July 2012, the Company entered into a ground lease with Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. (“Wegmans”) at the Company’s undeveloped site located at Sylvan Way and Ridgedale Avenue in Hanover Township, New Jersey. Subject to receiving all necessary governmental approvals, Wegmans intends to construct a store of approximately 140,000 square feet on a finished pad scheduled to be completed in the first quarter of 2017.  The project is expected to cost approximately $28.7 million to complete (of which, as of September 30, 2015 the Company has incurred $13.9 million of the development costs, and estimates  it will need to fund an additional $14.8 million for the completion of the project). 

The Company owns a 76.25 percent interest in a consolidated joint venture which is constructing a 108-unit multi-family development rental property located in Eastchester, New York (the “Eastchester Project”).  The project is expected to be ready for occupancy by the second quarter of 2016.  The Eastchester Project is estimated to cost a total of $50 million (of which development costs of $22.7 million have been incurred through September 30, 2015).  The venture has a $28.8 million construction loan (with $6.6 million outstanding as of September 30, 2015).  The Company expects to fund approximately $20.9 million for the development of the project (of which, as of September 30, 2015, the Company has incurred $13.5 million of the development costs and estimates it will need to fund an additional $7.4 million for the completion of the project). 

On April 1, 2015, the Company acquired vacant land to accommodate a two-phase development of the CitySquare Project for a purchase price of $3.1 million with an additional $1.25 million to be paid (which is accrued as of September 30, 2015), subject to certain conditions, in accordance with the terms of the purchase and sale agreement.  The purchase price for the acquisition was funded primarily through borrowing under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.  The first phase with 237 units started construction in the third quarter 2015 with anticipated initial deliveries in the second quarter 2017.  The second phase, with 128 units, is projected to begin construction in 2017.  Total development costs are estimated to be approximately $92.5 million (of which $7.1 million was incurred by the Company through September 30, 2015 and estimates it will need to fund an additional $85.4 million for the completion of the project).  

On October 6, 2015, the Company entered into a joint venture partnership with XS Port Imperial Hotel, LLC (“XS”) to form XS Hotel Urban Renewal Associates LLC (“XS Hotel URA”) for the development and ownership of a ­­­364-key dual branded hotel property located in Weehawken, New Jersey (“Port Imperial Hotel”).  Concurrently, the Company and XS entered into a separate joint venture partnership to form XS Hotel Associates, L.L.C. (“XS Hotel”) for the management and operations of the completed hotel development.  The Company holds a 90 percent interest and XS holds the remaining 10 percent interest in the consolidated joint ventures, XS Hotel URA and XS Hotel, with the Company having full and complete authority, power, and discretion to manage and control the ventures’ business, affairs, and property.  The construction of the Port Imperial Hotel is estimated to cost a total of $129.6 million, which will be funded by a $94 million construction loan with the balance to be funded with members’ capital.  Upon closing, Mack-Cali’s initial contribution was $27.3 million, which included a capital credit of $23.7 million for its contributed Hotel Condominium Land unit, and XS Hotel’s initial contribution was $3 million.  The Company expects to fund additional costs of approximately $4.8 million.
 
 
 
 
50
 

 
The Company owns developable land to accommodate a multi-phase development project of approximately 1,034-unit multi-family rental property located in Malden, Massachusetts.  The initial phase commenced construction of 292 units in the third quarter of 2015 (the “Chase II Project”).  The Chase II project is estimated to cost a total of $74.4 million (of which the Company has incurred $12.4 million through September 30, 2015) and is expected to be ready for occupancy by second quarter of 2017.  The Company estimates it will need to fund additional costs of $62 million for the completion of the Chase II Project.     

REIT Restrictions:
To maintain its qualification as a REIT under the Code, the Company must make annual distributions to its stockholders of at least 90 percent of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains.  Moreover, the Company intends to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to its common stockholders.  Based upon the most recently paid common stock dividend rate of $0.15 per common share, in the aggregate, such distributions would equal approximately $53.3 million ($60 million, including common units in the Operating Partnership, held by parties other than the Company) on an annualized basis.  However, any such distributions, whether for federal income tax purposes or otherwise, would be paid out of available cash, including borrowings and other sources, after meeting operating requirements, preferred stock dividends and distributions, and scheduled debt service on the Company’s debt.  If and to the extent the Company retains and does not distribute any net capital gains, the Company will be required to pay federal, state and local taxes on such net capital gains at the rate applicable to capital gains of a corporation.

Property Lock-Ups:
The Company may not dispose of or distribute certain of its properties, currently comprised of seven properties with an aggregate net carrying value of approximately $57.3 million, which were originally contributed by certain unrelated common unitholders of the Operating Partnership, without the express written consent of such common unitholders, as applicable, except in a manner which does not result in recognition of any built-in-gain (which may result in an income tax liability) or which reimburses the appropriate specific common unitholders for the tax consequences of the recognition of such built-in-gains (collectively, the “Property Lock-Ups”).  The aforementioned restrictions do not apply in the event that the Company sells all of its properties or in connection with a sale transaction which the Company’s Board of Directors determines is reasonably necessary to satisfy a material monetary default on any unsecured debt, judgment or liability of the Company or to cure any material monetary default on any mortgage secured by a property.  The Property Lock-Ups expire periodically through 2016.  Upon the expiration of the Property Lock-Ups, the Company is generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent any sale, transfer or other disposition of the subject properties from resulting in the recognition of built-in gain to the specific common unitholders, which include members of the Mack Group (which includes William L. Mack, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors; David S. Mack, director; Earle I. Mack, a former director; and Mitchell E. Hersh, former president, chief executive officer and director), the Robert Martin Group (which includes Robert F. Weinberg, a former director and current member of its Advisory Board), and the Cali Group (which includes John R. Cali, a former director and current member of its Advisory Board).  As of September 30, 2015, 110 of the Company’s properties, with an aggregate net book value of approximately $1.3 billion, have lapsed restrictions and are subject to these conditions.

Unencumbered Properties:
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had 202 unencumbered properties with a carrying value of $2.4 billion representing 91.0 percent of the Company’s total consolidated property count.


Cash Flows

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $1.3 million to $30.9 million at September 30, 2015, compared to $29.6 million at December 31, 2014.  This decrease is comprised of the following net cash flow items:
         
 
(1)                
$124.7 million provided by operating activities.
         
 
(2) 
$90.4 million used in investing activities, consisting primarily of the following:
         
   
(a)
$68.5 million used for investments in unconsolidated joint ventures; plus
   
(b)
$59.7 million used for additions to rental property and improvements; plus
   
(c)
$50 million used for the development of rental property, other related costs and deposits; plus
   
(d)
$5.8 million used for restricted cash; minus
   
(e)
$81 million from proceeds from the sales of rental property; minus
   
(f)
$7.8 million received from payments of notes receivables; minus
   
(g)
$6.4 million from proceeds from the sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture; minus
   
(h)
$6.1 million used for rental property acquisitions and related intangibles; minus
   
(i)
$4.3 million received from distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures.
       
 
(3)                
$32.9 million provided by financing activities, consisting primarily of the following:
         
   
(a)
$179 million from borrowings under the revolving credit facility; plus
   
(b)
$6.2 million from proceeds received from mortgages and loans payable; plus
   
(c)
$0.3 million from contributions from noncontrolling interests; minus
   
(d)
$144 million used for repayments of revolving credit facility; minus
   
(e)
$45 million used for payments of dividends and distributions; minus
   
(f)
$29.3 million used for repayments of mortgages, loans payable and other obligations; minus
   
(g)
$0.1 million used for repayment of finance costs.
 
 
 
 
51
 

 

Debt Financing

Summary of Debt:
The following is a breakdown of the Company’s debt between fixed and variable-rate financing as of September 30, 2015:

                 
   
Balance
    
Weighted Average
    
Weighted Average
   
($000’s)
% of Total
  
Interest Rate (a)
    
Maturity in Years
Fixed Rate Unsecured Debt and
                
  Other Obligations
$
 1,268,568 
 62.08 
%
 4.88 
%
  
 4.41 
Fixed Rate Secured Debt
  
 597,185 
 29.22 
%
 7.13 
%
  
 2.78 
Variable Rate Secured Debt
  
 142,839 
 6.99 
%
 3.87 
%
  
 1.25 
Variable Rate Unsecured Debt (b)
  
 35,000 
 1.71 
%
 1.51 
%
  
 1.83 
                 
Totals/Weighted Average:
$
 2,043,592 
 100.00 
%
 5.41 
%
(b)
 3.67 
                 
(a)
The actual weighted average LIBOR rate for the Company’s outstanding variable rate debt was 0.20 percent as of September 30, 2015, plus the applicable spread.
(b)
Excludes amortized deferred financing costs pertaining to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which amounted to $0.8 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
 
Debt Maturities:
Scheduled principal payments and related weighted average annual effective interest rates for the Company’s debt as of September 30, 2015 are as follows:
                         
   
Scheduled
    
Principal
        
Weighted Avg.
  
   
Amortization
    
Maturities
    
Total
  
Effective Interest Rate of
  
Period
  
($000’s)
    
($000’s)
    
($000’s)
  
Future Repayments (a)
  
October 1 to December 31, 2015
$
 2,054
  
$
 113,615
  
$
 115,669
  
 6.82
%
  
2016
  
 8,125
    
 304,433
    
 312,558
  
 6.38
%
  
2017 (b)
  
 7,275
    
 432,719
    
 439,994
  
 3.88
%
  
2018
  
 7,311
    
 231,536
    
 238,847
  
 6.67
%
  
2019
  
 723
    
 331,566
    
 332,289
  
 7.44
%
  
Thereafter
  
 6,328
    
 605,206
    
 611,534
  
 4.13
%
  
Sub-total
  
 31,816
    
 2,019,075
    
 2,050,891
        
Adjustment for unamortized debt
                        
  discount/premium, net, as of
                        
 September 30, 2015
  
 (7,299)
    
 -
    
 (7,299)
        
                         
Totals/Weighted Average
$
 24,517
  
$
 2,019,075
  
$
 2,043,592
  
 5.41
%
(c)
                         
(a)  
The actual weighted average LIBOR rate for the Company’s outstanding variable rate debt was 0.20 percent as of September 30, 2015, plus the applicable spread.
(b)
Includes outstanding borrowings of the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility of $35 million which matures in 2017 with two six-month extension options with the payment of a fee.
(c)
Excludes amortized deferred financing costs pertaining to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which amounted to $0.8 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
 
 
 
52
 
 
 
Senior Unsecured Notes:
The terms of the Company’s senior unsecured notes (which totaled approximately $1.3 billion as of September 30, 2015) include certain restrictions and covenants which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum amount of debt leverage, the maximum amount of secured indebtedness, the minimum amount of debt service coverage and the maximum amount of unsecured debt as a percent of unsecured assets.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility:
On July 16, 2013, the Company amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of 17 lenders.  The $600 million facility is expandable to $1 billion and matures in July 2017.  It has two six month extension options each requiring the payment of a 7.5 basis point fee.  The interest rate on outstanding borrowings (not electing the Company’s competitive bid feature) and the facility fee on the current borrowing capacity payable quarterly in arrears are based upon the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt ratings, as follows:
         
Operating Partnership's
  
Interest Rate -
    
Unsecured Debt Ratings:
  
Applicable Basis Points
  
Facility Fee
Higher of S&P or Moody's
  
Above LIBOR
  
Basis Points
No ratings or less than BBB-/Baa3
  
170.0
  
35.0
BBB- or Baa3 (current)
  
130.0
  
30.0
BBB or Baa2
  
110.0
  
20.0
BBB+ or Baa1
  
100.0
  
15.0
A- or A3 or higher
  
92.5
  
12.5
 
The facility has a competitive bid feature, which allows the Company to solicit bids from lenders under the facility to borrow up to $300 million at interest rates less than those above.

The terms of the unsecured facility include certain restrictions and covenants which limit, among other things the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of real estate properties (to the extent that: (i) such property dispositions cause the Company to default on any of the financial ratios of the facility described below, or (ii) the property dispositions are completed while the Company is under an event of default under the facility, unless, under certain circumstances, such disposition is being carried out to cure such default), and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum leverage ratio (60 percent), the maximum amount of secured indebtedness (40 percent), the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage (1.5 times), the maximum amount of unsecured indebtedness (60 percent), the minimum amount of unencumbered property interest coverage (2.0 times) and certain investment limitations (generally 15 percent of total capitalization).  If an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company will not make any excess distributions except to enable the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT under the Code.

As of October 26, 2015, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $67 million under its unsecured revolving credit facility.

Mortgages, Loans Payable and Other Obligations and Notes Receivables:
The Company has other mortgages, loans payable and other obligations which consist of various loans collateralized by certain of the Company’s rental properties.  Payments on mortgages, loans payable and other obligations are generally due in monthly installments of principal and interest, or interest only.

Debt Strategy:
The Company does not intend to reserve funds to retire the Company’s senior unsecured notes, outstanding borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, or its mortgages, loans payable and other obligations upon maturity.  Instead, the Company will seek to refinance such debt at maturity or retire such debt through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities on or before the applicable maturity dates.  If it cannot raise sufficient proceeds to retire the maturing debt, the Company may draw on its revolving credit facility to retire the maturing indebtedness, which would reduce the future availability of funds under such facility.  As of October 26, 2015, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $67 million under its unsecured revolving credit facility.  The Company is reviewing various financing and refinancing options, including the purchase of its senior unsecured notes in privately-negotiated transactions, the issuance of additional, or exchange of current, unsecured debt, common and preferred stock, and/or obtaining additional mortgage debt, some or all of which may be completed in 2015.  The Company currently anticipates that its available cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities and proceeds from the sale of office properties, together with cash available from borrowings and other sources, will be adequate to meet the Company’s capital and liquidity needs in the short term.  However, if these sources of funds are insufficient or unavailable, due to current economic conditions or otherwise, or if capital needs to fund acquisition and development opportunities in the multi-family rental sector arise, the Company’s ability to make the expected distributions discussed in “REIT Restrictions” above may be adversely affected. 
 
 
 
53
 

 

Equity Financing and Registration Statements

Common Equity:
The following table presents the changes in the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock and the Operating Partnership’s Common Units for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
       
 
Common
 Common
  
 
Stock
Units
Total
Outstanding at January 1, 2015
 89,076,578
 11,083,876
 100,160,454
Common units redeemed for Common Stock
 293,734
 (293,734)
 -
Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment
      
  and Stock Purchase Plan
 3,107
 -
 3,107
Restricted shares issued
 45,597
 -
 45,597
Cancellation of shares
 (108,773)
 -
 (108,773)
Outstanding at September 30, 2015
 89,310,243
 10,790,142
 100,100,385

Share Repurchase Program:
The Company has a share repurchase program which was renewed and authorized by its Board of Directors in September 2012 to purchase up to $150 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock (“Repurchase Program”), which it may repurchase from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing prices or through privately negotiated transactions.  As of September 30, 2015, the Company has a remaining authorization under the Repurchase Program of $139 million.  There were no common stock repurchases in 2014 and through October 26, 2015.  

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan:
The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRIP”) which commenced in March 1999 under which approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for future issuance.  The DRIP provides for automatic reinvestment of all or a portion of a participant’s dividends from the Company’s shares of common stock.  The DRIP also permits participants to make optional cash investments up to $5,000 a month without restriction and, if the Company waives this limit, for additional amounts subject to certain restrictions and other conditions set forth in the DRIP prospectus filed as part of the Company’s effective registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the DRIP.

Shelf Registration Statements:
The Company has an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC for an aggregate amount of $2.0 billion in common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, and/or warrants of the Company, under which no securities have been sold as of October 26, 2015.

The Company and the Operating Partnership also have an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC for an aggregate amount of $2.5 billion in common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and guarantees of the Company and debt securities of the Operating Partnership, under which no securities have been sold as of October 26, 2015.
 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Unconsolidated Joint Venture Debt:
The debt of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures generally provide for recourse to the Company for customary matters such as intentional misuse of funds, environmental conditions and material misrepresentations. The Company has agreed to guarantee repayment of a portion of the debt of its unconsolidated joint ventures.  Such debt has a total facility amount of $453.6 million of which the Company has agreed to guarantee up to $62 million.  As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding balance of such debt totaled $268.3 million of which $53.1 million was guaranteed by the Company.  The Company has also posted a $3.6 million letter of credit in support of the Harborside South Pier joint venture, half of which is indemnified by Hyatt Corporation, the Company’s joint venture partner.

The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements are further discussed in Note 4: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures to the Financial Statements.
 
 
 
54
 
 
 
Contractual Obligations

The following table outlines the timing of payment requirements related to the Company’s debt (principal and interest), PILOT agreements, ground lease agreements and other obligations, as of September 30, 2015:
                                   
         
Payments Due by Period
         
Less than 1
    
1 – 3
    
4 – 5
    
6 – 10
    
After 10
(dollars in thousands)
  
Total
    
Year
    
Years
    
Years
    
Years
    
Years
Senior unsecured notes
$
 1,537,726 
  
$
 253,588 
  
$
 342,450 
  
$
 313,700 
  
$
 627,988 
    
 -
Revolving credit facility (a)
  
 35,972 
    
 530 
    
 35,442 
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
Mortgages, loans payable
                                  
  and other obligations (b)
  
 855,975 
    
 208,373 
    
 301,285 
    
 296,940 
    
 14,334 
  
$
 35,043 
Payments in lieu of taxes
                                  
  (PILOT)
  
 29,225 
    
 4,407 
    
 13,222 
    
 8,815 
    
 2,781 
    
 -
Ground lease payments
  
 16,803 
    
 389 
    
 772 
    
 464 
    
 1,171 
    
 14,007 
Other
  
 2,822 
    
 1,167 
    
 1,655 
    
 -
    
 -
    
 -
Total
$
 2,478,523 
  
$
 468,454 
  
$
 694,826 
  
$
 619,919 
  
$
 646,274 
  
$
 49,050 
 
 
(a)  
Interest payments assume LIBOR rate of 0.21 percent, which is the weighted average rate on this outstanding variable rate debt at September 30, 2015, plus the applicable spread.
(b)  
Interest payments assume LIBOR rate of 0.20 percent, which is the weighted average rate on its outstanding variable rate mortgage debt at September 30, 2015, plus the applicable spread. 

Departure of Chief Executive Officer:
On November 4, 2014, the Company announced that Mitchell E. Hersh would step down as president and chief executive officer of the Company effective May 11, 2015 and would not stand for re-election to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) at the 2015 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders.  Pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement, the Company elected to extend the separation date to June 30, 2015 (the “Separation Date”).  In connection with Mr. Hersh’s departure from the Company, the Company and Mr. Hersh entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) dated November 4, 2014 (the “Effective Date”).  The Separation Agreement provided that Mr. Hersh’s employment with the Company was being terminated without cause, and further provided, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Hersh’s employment agreement, multi-year performance award agreement, TSR-based performance award agreement and deferred retirement compensation agreement, for (i) a cash payment to Mr. Hersh of $8 million, (ii) payment of the premiums for the continuation of Mr. Hersh’s health, dental and vision insurance for 48 months following the Separation Date, (iii) vesting of 210,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s multi-year performance award agreement, (iv) a cash payment equal to the sum of (X) $504,000, plus (Y) the product of (1) 210,000 multiplied by (2) the aggregate amount of dividends on the Company’s common stock that were declared and paid between the Effective Date and the Separation Date in payment of accrued but unpaid dividend equivalents pursuant to his multi-year performance award agreement, (v) issuance of 41,811 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Deferred Shares”) pursuant to the acceleration of vesting of 675 performance shares pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s TSR-based performance award agreement, and (vi) a cash payment of $2,311,792 pursuant to Mr. Hersh’s deferred retirement compensation award agreement. All such cash amounts and Deferred Shares will be paid to Mr. Hersh on the date that is six months and one day from the Separation Date, except in the event of death or if the payment event is due to Mr. Hersh’s disability, in which case the payments will occur shortly after such death or disability.  Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Hersh continued to receive his base salary in accordance with his employment agreement and to be eligible to participate in the Company’s executive incentive compensation and bonus programs.  In addition, upon departure Mr. Hersh was entitled to receive his accrued but unpaid base salary and to have his expenses reimbursed.


Funds from Operations 
 
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is defined as net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest of unitholders, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from extraordinary items, sales or disposals of depreciable rental property, and impairments related to depreciable rental property, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization.  The Company believes that FFO is helpful to investors as one of several measures of the performance of an equity REIT.  The Company further believes that as FFO excludes the effect of depreciation, gains (or losses) from sales of properties and impairments related to depreciable rental property (all of which are based on historical costs which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current performance), FFO can facilitate comparison of operating performance between equity REITs.   
 
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income available to common shareholders as an indication of the Company’s performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.    FFO presented herein is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definition.  However, the Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the current definition of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). 
 
 
 
55
 
 
 
As the Company considers its primary earnings measure, net income available to common shareholders, as defined by GAAP, to be the most comparable earnings measure to FFO, the following table presents a reconciliation of net income available to common shareholders to FFO, as calculated in accordance with NAREIT’s current definition, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): 
                       
   
              Three Months Ended
    
            Nine Months Ended
     
  September 30,
      
  September 30,
   
2015
    
2014
    
2015
    
2014
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
$
 (126,892)
  
$
 1,982 
  
$
 (94,034)
  
$
 37,807 
Add (deduct):  Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership
  
 (15,530)
    
 248 
    
 (11,461)
    
 4,754 
Real estate-related depreciation and amortization on
                      
   continuing operations (a)
  
 48,503 
    
 46,071 
    
 142,168 
    
 140,810 
Impairments
  
 164,176 
    
 -
    
 164,176 
    
 -
Realized (gains) losses and unrealized losses
                      
  on disposition of rental property, net
  
 (18,718)
    
 (264)
    
 (53,261)
    
 (54,848)
Gain on sale of investment in unconsolidated
                      
  joint venture
  
 -
    
 -
    
 (6,448)
    
 -
Funds from operations
$
 51,539 
  
$
 48,037 
  
$
 141,140 
  
$
 128,523 
 
(a)
Includes the Company’s share from unconsolidated joint ventures of $4,845 and $4,181 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $15,828 and $9,396 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  Excludes non-real estate-related depreciation and amortization of $238 and $93 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $723 and $265 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively


Inflation

The Company’s leases with the majority of its commercial tenants provide for recoveries and escalation charges based upon the tenant’s proportionate share of, and/or increases in, real estate taxes and certain operating costs, which reduce the Company’s exposure to increases in operating costs resulting from inflation.

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We consider portions of this information, including the documents incorporated by reference, to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 21E of such act.  Such forward-looking statements relate to, without limitation, our future economic performance, plans and objectives for future operations and projections of revenue and other financial items.  Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “potential,” “projected,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or comparable terminology.  Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which we cannot predict with accuracy and some of which we might not even anticipate.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions at the time made, we can give no assurance that such expectations will be achieved.  Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

Among the factors about which we have made assumptions are:

·  
risks and uncertainties affecting the general economic climate and conditions, which in turn may have a negative effect on the fundamentals of our business and the financial condition of our tenants and residents;
·  
the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis;
·  
the extent of any tenant bankruptcies or of any early lease terminations;
·  
our ability to lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents;
·  
changes in the supply of and demand for our properties;
·  
changes in interest rate levels and volatility in the securities markets;
·  
our ability to complete construction and development activities on time and within budget, including without limitation obtaining regulatory permits and the availability and cost of materials, labor and equipment;
·  
forward-looking financial and operational information, including information relating to future development projects, potential acquisitions or dispositions, and projected revenue and income;
·  
changes in operating costs;
·  
our ability to obtain adequate insurance, including coverage for terrorist acts;
·  
our credit worthiness and the availability of financing on attractive terms or at all, which may adversely impact our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt and our future interest expense;
·  
changes in governmental regulation, tax rates and similar matters; and
·  
other risks associated with the development and acquisition of properties, including risks that the development may not be completed on schedule, that the tenants or residents will not take occupancy or pay rent, or that development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated.
 
 
 
56
 

 
For further information on factors which could impact us and the statements contained herein, see Item 1A: Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.  We assume no obligation to update and supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events, new information or otherwise.


Item 3.
Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices.  In pursuing its business plan, the primary market risk to which the Company is exposed is interest rate risk.  Changes in the general level of interest rates prevailing in the financial markets may affect the spread between the Company’s yield on invested assets and cost of funds and, in turn, its ability to make distributions or payments to its investors.

Approximately $1.9 billion of the Company’s long-term debt as of September 30, 2015 bears interest at fixed rates and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates.  The following table presents principal cash flows (in thousands) based upon maturity dates of the debt obligations and the related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates for the fixed rate debt.  The interest rates on the Company’s variable rate debt as of September 30, 2015 ranged from LIBOR plus 130 basis points to LIBOR plus 950 basis points.  Assuming interest-rate caps are not in effect, if market rates of interest on the Company’s variable rate debt increased or decreased by 100 basis points, then the increase or decrease in interest costs on the Company’s variable rate debt would be approximately $1.8 million annually and the increase or decrease in the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt as of September 30, 2015 would be approximately $63 million.
                                                           
September 30, 2015
                                                          
Debt,
including current portion
  
10/1/2015 -
                                                    
Fair
($s in thousands)
  
12/31/2015
    
2016
    
2017
    
2018
    
2019
    
Thereafter
    
Sub-total
    
Other (a)
    
Total
    
Value
                                                           
Fixed Rate
$
70,898
  
$
248,558
  
$
397,493
  
$
237,447
  
$
307,122
  
$
611,534
  
$
1,873,052
  
$
(7,299)
  
$
1,865,753
  
$
1,889,624
Average Interest Rate
  
9.91
%
  
7.44
%
  
4.12
%
  
6.70
%
  
7.88
%
  
4.13
%
              
5.60
%
    
                                                           
Variable Rate
$
44,771
  
$
 64,000
  
$
42,501
(b)
$
 1,400
  
$
 25,167
    
 -
  
$
177,839
    
 -
  
$
177,839
  
$
177,839
                                                           
(a)  Adjustment for unamortized debt discount/premium, net, as of September 30, 2015.
(b)  Includes $35 million of outstanding borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility which matures in 2017 with two six-month extension options with the payment of a fee.
 
While the Company has not experienced any significant credit losses, in the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in losses to the Company which could adversely affect its operating results and liquidity.



 
57
 

Item 4.                 Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer, president and chief operating officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.

Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
58
 


MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

Part II – Other Information


Item 1.        Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, to which the Company is a party or to which any of its Properties are subject.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in our assessment of risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Item 2.        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)               COMMON STOCK
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued 221,927 shares of common stock to holders of common units in the Operating Partnership upon the redemption of such common units in private offerings pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.  The holders of the common units were limited partners of the Operating Partnership and accredited investors under Rule 501 of the Securities Act.  The common units were redeemed for an equal number of shares of common stock.  The Company has registered the resale of such shares under the Securities Act.

(b)               Not Applicable.

(c)               Not Applicable.

Item 3.       Defaults Upon Senior Securities

(a)               Not Applicable.

(b)               Not Applicable.

Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures

 Not Applicable.

Item 5.        Other Information

(a)
Not Applicable.

(b)
None.

Item 6.        Exhibits

 
The exhibits required by this item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

 
59
 




MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


     
   
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation
   
(Registrant)
 
 
     
     
     
Date:           October 28, 2015
By:
/s/ Mitchell E. Rudin
   
Mitchell E. Rudin
   
Chief Executive Officer
   
(principal executive officer)
     
     
     
Date:           October 28, 2015
By:
/s/ Michael J. DeMarco
   
Michael J. DeMarco
   
President and Chief Operating Officer
     
     
     
Date:           October 28, 2015
By:
/s/ Anthony Krug
   
Anthony Krug
   
Chief Financial Officer
   
(principal financial officer and
   
   principal accounting officer)






 
60
 

MACK-CALI REALTY CORPORATION

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
3.1
  
Articles of Restatement of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation dated September 18, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 17, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.2
  
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Restatement of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation as filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on May 14, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 12, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.3
  
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation dated June 10, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 10, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.4
  
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation dated March 4, 2003, (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.5
  
Amendment No. 2 to the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws dated May 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 24, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.6
  
Amendment No. 3 to the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws dated May 14, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated 12, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.7
  
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. dated December 11, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.110 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 11, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.8
  
Amendment No. 1 to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. dated August 21, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-57103, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.9
  
Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. dated July 6, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 6, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.10
  
Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. dated September 30, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.1
  
Indenture dated as of March 16, 1999, by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated March 16, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.2
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 1 dated as of March 16, 1999, by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated March 16, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.3
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 2 dated as of August 2, 1999, by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Operating Partnership’s Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.4
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated as of December 21, 2000, by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated December 21, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.5
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of January 29, 2001, by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated January 29, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.6
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of December 20, 2002, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K dated December 20, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).

 
61
 



     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
4.7
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of March 14, 2003, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.8
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 7 dated as of June 12, 2003, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 12, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.9
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 8 dated as of February 9, 2004, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 9, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.10
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 9 dated as of March 22, 2004, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.11
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 10 dated as of January 25, 2005, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated January 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.12
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 11 dated as of April 15, 2005, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 15, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.13
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 12 dated as of November 30, 2005, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.14
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 13 dated as of January 24, 2006, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated January 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.15
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 14 dated as of August 14, 2009, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 14, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.16
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 15 dated as of April 19, 2012, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 19, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.17
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 16 dated as of November 20, 2012, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee. (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 20, 2012  and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.18
  
Supplemental Indenture No. 17 dates as of May 8, 2013, by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 8, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.1
  
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 1999 between Mitchell E. Hersh and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.2 
  
Letter Agreement dated December 9, 2008 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mitchell E. Hersh (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 9, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     


 
62
 



     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.3
  
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 1999 between Barry Lefkowitz and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.4
  
Letter Agreement dated December 9, 2008 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Barry Lefkowitz (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 9, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.5
  
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 1999 between Roger W. Thomas and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.6
  
Letter Agreement dated December 9, 2008 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roger W. Thomas (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 9, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.7
  
Contribution and Exchange Agreement among The MK Contributors, The MK Entities, The Patriot Contributors, The Patriot Entities, Patriot American Management and Leasing Corp., Cali Realty, L.P. and Cali Realty Corporation, dated September 18, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.98 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 19, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.8
  
First Amendment to Contribution and Exchange Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1997, by and among the Company and the Mack Group (filed as Exhibit 10.99 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 11, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.9
  
Employee Stock Option Plan of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8, Registration No. 333-44443, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.10
  
Director Stock Option Plan of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8, Registration No. 333-44443, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.11
  
2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-52478, and incorporated herein by reference), as amended by the First Amendment to the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.12
  
Amended and Restated 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-100244, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.13
  
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation 2004 Incentive Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-116437, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.14
  
Amended and Restated Mack-Cali Realty Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 9, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.15
  
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 Registration No. 333-188729, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.16
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and William L. Mack dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.101 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.17
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mitchell E. Hersh dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.102 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.18
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Alan S. Bernikow dated May 20, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.104 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.19
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Kenneth M. Duberstein dated September 13, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.106 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.20
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Nathan Gantcher dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.107 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).


 
63
 




     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.21
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and David S. Mack dated December 11, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.108 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.22
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Alan G. Philibosian dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.109 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.23
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Irvin D. Reid dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.110 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.24
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Vincent Tese dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.111 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.25
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roy J. Zuckerberg dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.113 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.26
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Barry Lefkowitz dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.114 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.27
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roger W. Thomas dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.116 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.28
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Anthony Krug dated October 22, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.29
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Jonathan Litt dated March 3, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.30
  
Indemnification Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Gary T. Wagner dated November 11, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.31
  
Indemnification Agreement dated October 22, 2002 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and John Crandall (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.32
  
Second Amendment to Contribution and Exchange Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2000, between RMC Development Company, LLC f/k/a Robert Martin Company, LLC, Robert Martin Eastview North Company, L.P., the Company and the Operating Partnership (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Company's Form 10-K dated December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.33
  
Contribution and Exchange Agreement by and between Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. and Tenth Springhill Lake Associates L.L.L.P., Eleventh Springhill Lake Associates L.L.L.P., Twelfth Springhill Lake Associates L.L.L.P., Fourteenth Springhill Lake Associates L.L.L.P., each a Maryland limited liability limited partnership, Greenbelt Associates, a Maryland general partnership, and Sixteenth Springhill Lake Associates L.L.L.P., a Maryland limited liability limited partnership, and certain other natural persons, dated as of November 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.69 to the Company's Form 10-K dated December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.34
  
Term Loan Agreement among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Arranger, and other lender which may become parties to this Agreement dated November 29, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.120 to the Company's Form 10-K dated December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.35
  
Agreement of Purchase and Sale among SLG Broad Street A LLC and SLG Broad Street C LLC, as Sellers, and M-C Broad 125 A L.L.C. and M-C Broad 125 C L.L.C., as Purchasers, dated as of March 15, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.121 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).


 
64
 




     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.36
  
Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated October 28, 2008 between M-C Plaza V L.L.C., Cal-Harbor V Urban Renewal Associates, L.P., Cal-Harbor V Leasing Associates L.L.C., as Mortgagors and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and New York Life Insurance Company as Mortgagees (filed as Exhibit 10.131 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.37
  
Promissory Note of M-C Plaza V L.L.C., Cal-Harbor V Urban Renewal Associates, L.P., Cal-Harbor V Leasing Associates L.L.C., as Borrowers, in favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, as Lender, in the principal amount of $120,000,000, dated October 28, 2008. (filed as Exhibit 10.132 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.38
  
Promissory Note of M-C Plaza V L.L.C., Cal-Harbor V Urban Renewal Associates, L.P., Cal-Harbor V Leasing Associates L.L.C., as Borrowers, in favor of New York Life Insurance Company, as Lender, in the principal amount of $120,000,000, dated October 28, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.133 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.39
  
Guarantee of Recourse Obligations of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and New York Life Insurance Company dated October 28, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.134 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.40
  
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among One Grande SPE LLC, 1280 Wall SPE LLC, 10 Sylvan SPE LLC, 5 Independence SPE LLC, 1 Independence SPE LLC, and 3 Becker SPE LLC, collectively, as Borrowers and Gramercy Warehouse Funding I LLC, as Lender, dated April 29, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.144 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.41
  
Amended and Restated Promissory Note of One Grande SPE LLC, 1280 Wall SPE LLC, 10 Sylvan SPE LLC, 5 Independence SPE LLC, 1 Independence SPE LLC, and 3 Becker SPE LLC, as Borrowers, in favor of Gramercy Warehouse Funding I, LLC, as Lender, dated April 29, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.145 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.42
  
Limited Liability Company Membership Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement dated April 29, 2009 by and among Gale SLG NJ LLC, Mack-Cali Ventures L.L.C., SLG Gale 55 Corporation LLC and 55 Corporate Partners L.L.C.  (filed as Exhibit 10.146 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.43
  
Amended and Restated Master Loan Agreement dated as of January 15, 2010 among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., and Affiliates of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as Borrowers, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty L.P., as Guarantors and The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated January 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.44
  
Partial Recourse Guaranty of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. dated as of January 15, 2010 to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated January 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.45
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Centre I in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.165 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.46
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Centre II in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.166 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.47
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Centre III in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.167 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).


 
65
 


     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.48
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Centre IV in Bergen County, New Jersey filed as Exhibit 10.168 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.49
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali F Properties, L.P., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Centre VII in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.169 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.50
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali Chestnut Ridge, L.L.C., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Corp. Center in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.170 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.51
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Mortgage and Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated as of January 15, 2010 by Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as Borrower, to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC, as Mortgagees with respect to Mack-Cali Saddle River in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.171 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.52
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Centre I in Bergen County, New Jersey  (filed as Exhibit 10.172 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.53
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre I in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.173 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.54
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Centre II in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.174 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
  
 
10.55
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre II in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.175 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.56
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Centre III in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.176 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.57
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre III in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.177 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.58
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Centre IV in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.178 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.59
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre IV in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.179 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.60
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali F Properties, L.P. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Centre VII in Bergen County, New Jersey  (filed as Exhibit 10.180 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.61
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali F Properties, L.P. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre VII in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.181 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

 
66
 




     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.62
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Chestnut Ridge, L.L.C. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Corp. Center in Bergen County, New Jersey  (filed as Exhibit 10.182 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.63
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Chestnut Ridge, L.L.C. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Corp. Center in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.183 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.64
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America with respect to Mack-Cali Saddle River in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.184 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.65
  
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. in favor of VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Saddle River in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.185 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.66
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. with respect to Mack-Cali Centre I in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.186 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.67
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. with respect to Mack-Cali Centre II in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.187 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.68
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. with respect to Mack-Cali Centre III in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.188 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.69
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. with respect to Mack-Cali Centre IV in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.189 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.70
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali F Properties, L.P. with respect to Mack-Cali Centre VII in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.190 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.71
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali Chestnut Ridge, L.L.C. with respect to Mack-Cali Corp. Center in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.191 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.72
  
Recourse Liabilities Guaranty dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to certain liabilities of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. with respect to Mack-Cali Saddle River in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.192 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.73
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre I in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.193 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).


 
67
 




     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.74
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre II in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.194 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.75
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre III in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.195 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.76
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre IV in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.196 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.77
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali F Properties, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Centre VII in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.197 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.78
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Chestnut Ridge, L.L.C. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Corp. Center in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.198 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.79
  
Amended and Restated Irrevocable Cross Collateral Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated January 15, 2010 of Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and VPCM, LLC with respect to Mack-Cali Saddle River in Bergen County, New Jersey (filed as Exhibit 10.199 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.80
  
Development Agreement dated December 5, 2011 by and between M-C Plaza VI & VII L.L.C. and Ironstate Development LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 5, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.81
  
Form of Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 5, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.82
  
Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., as borrower, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent, the other agents listed therein and the lending institutions party thereto and referred to therein dated as of October 21, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.134 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.83
  
Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 16, 2013 among Mack Cali Realty, L.P., as borrower, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, as guarantor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and the several Lenders party thereto, as lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 16, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.84
  
Multi-Year Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mitchell E. Hersh (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     


 
68
 




     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.85
  
Multi-Year Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Barry Lefkowitz (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.86
  
Multi-Year Restricted Stock Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roger W. Thomas (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.87
  
Amended and Restated TSR-Based Performance Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mitchell E. Hersh (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated June 12, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.88
  
Amended and Restated TSR-Based Performance Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Barry Lefkowitz (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated June 12, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.89
  
Amended and Restated TSR-Based Performance Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roger W. Thomas (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K dated June 12, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.90
  
Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mitchell E. Hersh (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.91
  
Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Barry Lefkowitz (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.92
  
Deferred Retirement Compensation Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2012, between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roger W. Thomas (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Form 8-K dated September 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.93
  
Form of Restricted share Award Agreement effective December 10, 2013 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and each of Mitchell E. Hersh, Barry Lefkowitz, Roger W. Thomas and Anthony Krug (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 10, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.94
  
Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement effective December 10, 2013 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and each of William L. Mack, Alan S. Bernikow, Kenneth M. Duberstein, Nathan Gantcher, David S. Mack, Alan G. Philibosian, Dr. Irvin D. Reid, Vincent Tese and Roy J. Zuckerberg (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated December 10, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.95
  
Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement effective December 9, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and each of William L. Mack, Alan S. Bernikow, Kenneth M. Duberstein, Nathan Gantcher, Jonathan Litt, David S. Mack, Alan G. Philibosian, Dr. Irvin D. Reid, Vincent Tese and Roy J. Zuckerberg (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 9, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.96
  
Membership Interest and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2012 (the "Purchase Agreement"), by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Mack-Cali Realty Acquisition Corp., Roseland Partners, L.L.C., and, for the limited purposes stated in the Purchase Agreement, each of Marshall B. Tycher, Bradford R. Klatt and Carl Goldberg (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated October 8, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.97
  
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2013 by and between Overlook Ridge Phase I, L.L.C., Overlook Ridge Phase IB, L.L.C. and Mack-Cali Realty Acquisition Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated January 17, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)


 
69
 




     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.98
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between Mack-Cali Pennsylvania Realty Associates, L.P., as seller, and Westlakes KPG III, LLC and Westlakes Land KPG III, LLC, as purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.99
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between M-C Rosetree Associates, L.P., as seller, and Rosetree KPG III, LLC and Rosetree Land KPG III, LLC, as purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.100
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between Mack-Cali-R Company No. 1 L.P., as seller, and Plymouth Meeting KPG III, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.101
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between Stevens Airport Realty Associates L.P., as seller, and Airport Land KPG III, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.102
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between Mack-Cali Airport Realty Associates L.P., as seller, and 100 Airport KPG III, LLC, 200 Airport KPG III, LLC and 300 Airport KPG III, LLC, as purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.103
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between Mack-Cali Property Trust, as seller, and 1000 Madison KPG III, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.104
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between Monument 150 Realty L.L.C., as seller, and Monument KPG III, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.105
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of July 15, 2013 by and between 4 Sentry Realty L.L.C. and Five Sentry Realty Associates L.P., as sellers, and Four Sentry KPG, LLC and Five Sentry KPG III, LLC, as purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 8-K dated July 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.106
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between Talleyrand Realty Associates, L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 Talleyrand, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.107
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between 400 Chestnut Realty L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 400 Chestnut Ridge, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.108
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between 470 Chestnut Realty L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 470 Chestnut Ridge, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.109
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between 530 Chestnut Realty L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 530 Chestnut Ridge, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).



 
70
 




     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.110
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali Taxter Associates, L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 Taxter, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.111
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali CW Realty Associates, L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 570 Taxter, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.112
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between 1717 Realty Associates L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 Ruote 208, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.113
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between Knightsbridge Realty L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 400 Knightsbridge, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.114
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between Kemble Plaza II Realty L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 400 Mt Kemble, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.115
  
Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of February 24, 2014 by and between 1266 Soundview Realty L.L.C., as seller, and H'Y2 Stamford, LLC, as purchaser (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.116
  
Agreement dated February 28, 2014 by and among Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Land & Buildings Capital Growth Fund, L.P., Land & Buildings Investment Management,LLC and Jonathan Litt (filed as Exhibit 10.116 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.117
  
Settlement and General Release Agreement dated March 1, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Barry Lefkowitz (filed as Exhibit 10.117 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.118
  
Settlement and General Release Agreement dated March 1, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Roger W. Thomas (filed as Exhibit 10.118 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.119
  
Restricted share Award Agreement effective March 19, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Anthony Krug (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K dated March 21, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.120
  
Separation Agreement dated July 18, 2014 by and between Roseland Management Services, L.P. and Bradford R. Klatt (filed as Exhibit 10.122 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.121
  
Separation Agreement dated July 18, 2014 by and between Roseland Management Services, L.P. and Carl Goldberg (filed as Exhibit 10.123 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.122
  
Amendment to Membership Interest and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2014, by and among Mack-Cali Realty, L.P., Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Mack-Cali Realty Acquisition Corp., Canoe Brook Investors, L.L.C. (formerly known as Roseland Partners, L.L.C.), Marshall B. Tycher, Bradford R. Klatt and Carl Goldberg (filed as Exhibit 10.124 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).


 
71
 


     
     
Exhibit 
    
Number
  
                                                                 Exhibit Title
     
10.123
  
Consulting Agreement dated July 18, 2014 by and between Roseland Management Services, L.P. and Carl Goldberg and Devra Goldberg (filed as Exhibit 10.125 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.124
  
Separation Agreement dated November 4, 2014 by and between Mack-Cali Realty Corporation and Mitchell E. Hersh (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 4, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.125
  
Severance Agreement dated March 4, 2015 by and between Anthony Krug and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.126
  
Severance Agreement dated March 4, 2015 by and between Gary T. Wagner and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation  (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.127
  
Employment Agreement dated June 3, 2015 by and between Mitchell E. Rudin and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.128
  
Employment Agreement dated June 3, 2015 by and between Michael J. DeMarco and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.129
  
Indemnification Agreement dated June 3, 2015 by and between Mitchell E. Rudin and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.129 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.130
  
Indemnification Agreement dated June 3, 2015 by and between Michael J. DeMarco and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.130 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.131*
  
Indemnification Agreement dated September 22, 2015 by and between Marshall B. Tycher and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation.
     
10.132*
  
Employment Agreement dated October 23, 2012 by and between Marshall B. Tycher and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation.
     
10.133*
  
Indemnification Agreement dated June 10, 2013 by and between Ricardo Cardoso and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation.
     
31.1*
  
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mitchell E. Rudin, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.2*
  
Certification of the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, Michael J. DeMarco, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.3*
  
Certification of the Company’s  Chief Financial Officer, Anthony Krug, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32.1*
  
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mitchell E. Rudin, the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, Michael J. DeMarco and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Anthony Krug, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
101.1*
  
The following financial statements from Mack-Cali Realty Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  (unaudited), and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). 
     
* filed herewith

 
    


 
72